1. Patriot Act - full speed ahead.
2. What's this news about warantless taps for so called "terrorism???"
( 3. by the way---- all that other chit chat they are sifting through.... do you really think they just bypass it?? illegal activity, and all that?? ya. RIGHT! they've got free reign. what a crock
So......
while we are having our american based dreams of freedom and equality robbed right from us, why cant we fight back??
How do we get the mobile companies to make stronger scrambles, hidden phone signals, something!!!
All this anti-freedom inventions, we should stand up
REALLY take a stand
demand our rights. because thats our privacy
What do you think America---
or the rest of the mo-fo world FOR THAT MATTER
?????
lets do something
before its too late
2006-09-29 05:47:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Here is the question I want answered
How does getting warrants in the traditional manner 'coddle' terrorists.
Seriously, this whole no oversight thing is scary
2006-09-29 06:52:53 · answer #1 · answered by BigD 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We lost 'em whilst the Supremes desperate that the deviants would desire to be making the guidelines instead of the folk. i actually would desire to love this one: "are affirming which you would be extra well-off with a 10 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old boy being compelled to apply a similar public restroom as a 40 5 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old guy in a dress?" Uh huh. And there it quite is. ethical relativism at artwork. i assume that it in no way occured to the author that it is the habit of the deviant that would desire to be dealt with. a guy in a dress should not be allowed to be out in public in the 1st place. If there isn't something incorrect with it, then why would desire to he be worried in any respect in regards to the ten 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old's misery? possibly it is because of the fact he subliminally is conscious that the ten 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old's misery at seeing a guy in a dress in public is objectively genuine looking? It factors out the main efficient component in the civil rights debate. The civil real it is being eroded away is the main appropriate of the folk to tell one yet another, "no". mutually as maximum everybody is worried approximately compromised e-mails, marriage definitions, and bathing room accomodations, what's quite at stake is the essential real of self governance.
2016-10-18 04:58:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are paranoid, period, seek some help.
Has this paranoia cost you friends, family or employment? Does it interfere with a normal social life or do you just hang with a bunch of other paranoids.
You have either been brainwashed, you are stupid or are delusional.
The problems in America today stem from career corrupt politicians, we need term limits and we need them now.
Read Vince Flynns book, Term Limits, it is eye opening.
Get some help and stay away from drugs and alcohol.
2006-09-29 13:18:11 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In canada if you are a third generation or older citisen you have no rights,try and get unimployment insurance,so many bells and whisyles for you imagrants especially rag heads get it and welfare
far easier,The patriate act in canada is a joke they have inabbotsfort sikh people growing berries inside the fen at the airport one of the most millatant groups in the world ,go figure
2006-09-29 05:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by cocheeise 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It over, we lost, the Socialist Dictator is now in control. The people too afraid to come together, especially when the Dictator has everyone opposed to each other. This was the first plan of attack; "Divide and Conquer".
Just go to work, pay your Tribute to them and hope they not use you as an example of their control using our money to do it. Then you be in their slave labor camps and people will look at you like you a criminal.
2006-09-29 05:58:46 · answer #5 · answered by Snaglefritz 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sometimes we have to sacrifice some things so that our country can have the freedom to go around the world taking other countries' freedom. If we had rights, terrorists would crash planes into our homes or something. Don't you see?
2006-09-29 06:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Once it happens, it's already too late, unless you're willing to do things most people don't care to think about or find crazy to get your rights back. Thomas Jefferson had the right idea.
2006-09-29 05:50:34 · answer #7 · answered by Zombie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The chief terrorist in the white house has decided that the people don't need much freedom at home. Only overseas should we have to fight for freedom.....
2006-09-29 06:26:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dubya(aka the decider) has decided you dont have any.
2006-09-29 06:00:52 · answer #9 · answered by stan l 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They went bye bye.
2006-09-29 05:49:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋