2006-09-29 05:23:26 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
lovelylex:I believe it is the NSPCC?
2006-09-29 05:30:35 · update #1
Thank you Angel, I was unaware! Now I am.
2006-09-29 07:51:41 · update #2
ok if you're refering to why is it known as the NSPCC- its because it was already set up and well known before its got its royal charter in 1895- it didn't change its name as it was already established and didn't want to be confused with the RSPCA.. so it does have the right to use RSPCC as it is sometimes known but chooses not to..the reason its known as the national society... is to reflect the fact it has branches in scotland. its Irish branches are i think known as children 1st. Does that make sense..
2006-09-29 05:34:59 · answer #1 · answered by Georgie's Girl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is - the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. It's known as the NSPCC. It didn't change it's name but was granted a Royal charter in 1895.
2006-09-29 05:38:14 · answer #2 · answered by samantha 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im sure there is a 'Royal' protection society for children. There is definately a Royal institute for psychiatry, the blind and other causes. It has something to do with the founding of the organisations i think.
2006-09-29 07:56:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this a British thing? In the USA I am unfamiliar with the concept. I know of several endangered species, and here they are either endangered or threatened or at risk, depending on how near they are to extinction.
I do think more emphasis is placed on protection of endangered animals than children, and I think children should have a higher priority.
2006-09-29 05:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
is it cos there's already an NSPCC that supports children?
Zulu9, have you ever been in a mental hospital? (just curious)
you are a fake cos i hacked in to your computer and saw everything hahahahahaha! you have a split personality disorder
2006-09-29 05:31:32 · answer #5 · answered by sasha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the prefix royal can only be used if a member of royalty is patron. From which one can only assume they didn't want to be associated with cruelty to children
2006-09-29 05:30:20 · answer #6 · answered by Jane S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it has to certified by the queen or Charles as a genuine charity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSPCA
By the way, its the NSPCC
2006-09-29 05:30:13 · answer #7 · answered by cuddlymummy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the royals can't be associated with the children for reasons i wont discuss
2006-09-29 05:26:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it not the RSPCC? R standing for Royal. I could be wrong...
2006-09-29 05:27:53 · answer #9 · answered by lovelylexie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I grew to become rather happy if on the coastline or an entertainment park . i became no extra desirable than happy approximately daily issues. i became consistently attempting to do some thing undesirable to have relaxing because of the fact i did not understand from now on appropriate. i became consistently happy if my mum and dad reported particular to a chum and me snoozing over. I enjoyed some pillow fights with friends. I enjoyed analyzing too like George under me.
2016-10-18 04:55:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋