whether you think the pakistani cricket captain was guilty of ball tampering in the 4th test and The Oval?
2006-09-29 05:14:58 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Maybe not Inzy, but Hair must have seen something wrong with the ball and must have been sure it was tampered with otherwise I doubt he would have done anything.
Several careers were at stake here, so for Hair to react without some sort of evidence would have been suicidal for his reputation as well as his career.
2006-09-29 05:26:20 · answer #1 · answered by psychoticgenius 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I too - (like Cool_Hack...) - find cricket a turn-off.
BUT...!!! - the handling of this "ball-tampering" case is significant to every society in the world today. Indeed, if almost any Pakistani sportsman were not "guilty of cheating" - THEN IT WOULD BE A FIRST...!
Because, Pakistan is a dog-eat-dog jungle of corruption virtually from the cradle to the grave - where cheating is second-nature and widely regarded as the only way to survive...!
2006-09-29 21:04:46 · answer #2 · answered by TruthHurts 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whether coverly or overtly, it was done, I am convinced. Now, as far as Inzy goes, he might not have ordered the man who did it. But as a captain, he is responsible for all acts of his team. Think of it this way, Hair may be racist and all that, but he is not a fool to stake his neck if he thought what he was doing was absolute rot. He had conclusive evidence. ICC, under pressure, as always, buckled. Only loss was to the game of cricket.
2006-09-29 18:25:38 · answer #3 · answered by slender 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, take my words, if Pakistan were guilty of the whole scenario they won't have protested like the way they did, the game was in Pakistan's court, and still they protested because the were innocent, and Inzi is an honest player he dont do sh*t like that to fox a damn filthy batting line up of england. Asif had already broken their back then why shoudl Inzi scratch the ball? was it to get rid of tail ender... hilarious. And let me tell you that a few overs back Alester cook hit a six and the ball landed on concrete, a 30+ over ball when lands on concrete is bound to get an odd shape and it did...
2006-09-29 05:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Ω Nookey™ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Since I have not seen the match, it is not correctr on my part to give any opinion on this issue. Since the Adjudicator, who happened to be an Asian, has cleared Inzamam from the charge of ball tampering due to lack of evidence, the matter should be treated as closed as airing opinion by other people is not going to have any bearing on this issue now
2006-09-30 03:06:43 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I believe he is guilty, although impossible to prove and this has now set a precedent for all tampering accusations with all teams just walking off the pitch in future
2006-09-29 06:03:48 · answer #6 · answered by Useless 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's OK that you can't respect anybody but then you don't have the right to talk nonsense about smbody. He is such a great player n u should think not twice but thrice before talking such things. He is not guilty. And don't forget they were in winning position.
2006-09-29 19:29:56 · answer #7 · answered by .. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO.....he was not at all guilty.....just because the Pakistani bowlers have the gifted art of reverse swing, it does not mean that they tamper with the ball!
Inzy is NOT at all the person who indulges in such acts...........
2006-09-29 18:27:57 · answer #8 · answered by Hasnain 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everybody knows the fact. Inzy's face, his gesture speaks for him. Once again he has proved, that he is not only a great player but he is a great human being also. He cud hav appealed against the verdict bt he accepted the punishment. And the way he accepted his suspension is simply great.
I salute you Inzy!
2006-09-29 21:01:35 · answer #9 · answered by goodbye 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not, to the charge of ball tampering.
2006-09-30 08:26:41 · answer #10 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋