Since GW has so much faith in Iraq,, Wouldent it only be right, we give George to them for a new President? I think they need him more then we do.. do you? Would we survive with out him?
2006-09-29 05:05:27 · 17 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yeah,,I see your vision,,but I don't think we need to go all the way to Iraq to dump a load of Trash! And I think these people have gone through allot already.
2006-09-29 09:58:06 · answer #1 · answered by jen w 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
While the congress sends troops to Iraq, keeps approving huge spending budgets for the war over and over, and is the actual unit granting permission to the security dept to wire tap without warrant, why do we keep pointing at Bush? The president does not have the authority to spend money in Iraq, send troops to Iraq, ect ect. The Congress loves sitting back and destroying this country while idiots like YOU point at the President every time THEY do something stupid. And they KNOW they can get away with it because Americans actually believe the President is the one doing it all. they are laughing all the way to the bank. Wake up America!
2006-09-29 05:10:41 · answer #2 · answered by godoompah 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He wouldn't last 10 minutes as it seems the lifespans over there are short!
Personally, as Bush is so dumb, I think he should be a m16 gunner on a unarmored Hummer that they equipped the troops with!
Bush has a backbone???? He sends troops to attack a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11 and slaughters thousands, creates an insurgency and a civil war, AND HE has a backbone!
Yea, he's like the rest of you right wingers, his backbone is to wiretap you illegally, cut widow's benefits of those killed in Iraq from $25,000 to $13,000, cut VA Hospitals by 8 Billion in 2006 and gives tax cuts to the rich! On top of that he is a deserter!
Some backbone! You guys really support the troops! Let's let them be killed for target practice as you aren't going to change a damn thing there!
2006-09-29 05:10:03 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Pack em all up and let them all live over there if Bush's work has worked out so wonderfully for Iraqis and Neocons alike. Bush wants another 100,000 Billion dollars from Congress for Iraq too from American tax payers. This doesn't include Conservatives though with their tax breaks, inflation will just go up some more to cover Bush's costs.
2006-09-29 05:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Heck! Please don't do that! Iraq's tall buildings would be flown into by his terrorists within the first 9 months of office.
As soon as he was sworn into office, he'd be shredding their constitution in order to suit his Nazi agenda.
He'd be invading and occupying America on nothing but a pack of lies. (oh that's right, he's already done that)
2006-09-29 05:18:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Louis Vuitton probably. I would love to see him drive through downtown Baghdad in a convertable.
2006-09-29 05:13:14 · answer #6 · answered by dingdong 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think some Republicans would definetely want to help him,uh,"pack" (snickers).
Like all things realted to foreign policy,Bush wont do anything that makes a lot of sense.But he should go!
2006-09-29 05:09:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I totally agree! We would definitely be better off without him. And not only that, but he deserves to be stranded in the middle of the mess he made!
2006-09-29 05:07:37 · answer #8 · answered by tangerine 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
And the rest of the hypocritical right wing should carry him there on their shoulders.
2006-09-29 05:09:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Would you rather have had Kerry in office. Bush actually has a backbone. He would do great in Iraq. All it would take is for people to listen and help instead of jumping on the "Bush bashing" bandwagon!
2006-09-29 05:09:15 · answer #10 · answered by only p 6 · 0⤊ 6⤋