He did not make enough money on his movie about 9/11 so he ginning up publicity because it's probably about to come out on DVD.
2006-09-29 04:50:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by jasonzbtzl 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Here's a unique idea for Yahoo Answers. Instead of asking a shallow, rhetoric filled question why don't you address Stone's points and tell us why you disagree?
This isn't just about Stone. I would say the same thing if someone wrote something similar about Bush or anyone else on the right.
2006-09-29 11:57:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I wanted to take map's suggestion to heart, but after I read the article, I can see that Stone, like most liberals, isn't making refutable points, merely giving his opinion. Opinion are like armpits, most people have at least a couple.
2006-09-29 12:17:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vincent Valentine 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oliver Stone isn't a liberal, my friend. He's an Arnold supporter and a moderate Republican.
2006-09-29 11:57:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doc Watson 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Stone has it right. Bush did set us back 10 years.
2006-09-29 11:50:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
At least he's not another flaming whacked one-sided armchair reactionary (who usually has his facts wrong because of Rush,Savage,etc.)
2006-09-29 12:00:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
HE IS JUST ANOTHER BRAIN DEAD HOLLYWOOD CLOWN WHO THINKS HE KNOWS EVERYTHING.
2006-09-29 14:16:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋