A) Everything was true about that day.
B) Everything except the Pentagon attack was true that day.
C) Everything was done by Bush and his administration.
D) Everything was true along with the invasion of Afghanistan, BUT the invasion of Iraq was wrong.
E) Everything was true along with BOTH invasions (Afghanistan and Iraq).
2006-09-29
04:03:49
·
19 answers
·
asked by
rjakjr
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Would it be so hard to give the letter or at least the sentence that went along with the letter I listed??? "stuck on stupid"? I'll never get why people answer questions like that aside from building up points, look in the mirror moron.
2006-09-29
04:15:29 ·
update #1
It's funny how different the Democrats and Republicans answer this question... first off, how did Bush NOT lie??? THE SHODDY INFO WAS PRODUCED BY HIS ADMINISTRATION... it's ok though keep watching fox news, it's really BRILLIANT... for ignorant people of course.
2006-09-29
04:17:21 ·
update #2
Don't be stuck on stupid
2006-09-29 04:05:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by j H 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don"t believe a single word of the official explanation about 9/11. I"m certainly no expert but can somebody explain to me how the WTC Towers collapsed at almost "free fall" rate when they had 47 "Massive Support Columns" made from 4 inch thick steel. If the floors "pancaked" then surely some of these massive columns would have distorted the collapse somewhat.
Why invade Afghanistan when the so called hijackers were from Saudi Arabia [ drugs?]
Iraq had no connection with the "terrorist" attacks, the only reason to go there was oil. That is the first area the Yanks protected when they got there. The rest of the country was being looted with no intervention by the troops
There are far more intelligent people than me who are very very concerned about the events of that day, and the subsequent actions such as "Homeland Security" etc etc. God help us all.
2006-09-29 04:31:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by researcher 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
nothing that The Bush Govt has told us about 9/11 is true.For those that think Bush is telling the truth,I say do your research.I read the 9/11 commission report and read "the new Pearl harbour" by Griffin.The evidence is overwhelming.I can count over 130 points that indicate cover up ,lies etc.
In my life experience I see that when someone is being less than forthright then they are lying or have something to hide.Pretty amazing how they had the steel from Wtc sold in 11 days and they got it out of the country on ships to Baosteel in china in Record time.For those who believe that the buildings melted and came down.Here is a simple fact.Steel melts ,bows or weakens at a much higher temperature than jet fuel in an open air environment burns at.
nO STEEL BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE IN THE HISTOTY OF THE WORLD!!And I am talking about some real towering infernos that burned up to 18 hours ,engulfing many floors.
For those that say they couldnt keep such a thing secret.I ask you.did you hear about the secret bombing in Laos during the Vietnam war?If not it proves my point that you havent done your research.WAKE UP!!!
2006-09-29 04:17:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul I 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yeah, Muhammad Attah and those guys were really Republican American Jewish guys trying to fire up a war! Sure.
There is no evidence Bush lied to get us into the Iraq war. He received perhaps shoddy information. Everybody thought Sadaam had mass weapons. Blair, France, Saudi Arabia, the Democrats too. But for fast political gain, the Dems now say Bush lied. What a disgrace.
As far as Afghanistan goes, there is hardly anybody who disagreed with that effort, even liberal Dems.
2006-09-29 04:09:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by TG Special 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
C) Everything was done by Bush and his administration.
That's the nearest to the truth that you provided.
However, the original master-minds were the puppetmasters of Bush and his administration - the Illuminati.
9/11 was way above the level of party politics, which are run by the Illuminati to keep people believing that democracy is still alive.
2006-10-01 04:43:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since you're leaving out Flight 93 I'll say A.
To jdmc2596: are you naive or just jumping into the conversation so you don't feel left out? The part of the building that was struck was just recently renovated, it was brand new. That was the suspicious part, that it happened in a part of the building that should have had thousands of employees, not a few hundred. That is why the conspiracy theories aren't being believed, people just spouting off and disregarding facts.
2006-09-29 04:23:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I saw on the Web (must be true) that the Pentagon wanted to renovate, but the Dept. of Defense vetoed any allocations. So the Pentagon had the Navy fire a Cruise missile at the building right where they wanted the renovations! This story is backed up by ex-professors and high ranking anonymous government officials.
2006-09-29 04:16:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
E..
The premise of your and "pals" attitude tend for me to see you as a Paranoid crack head that sees some vast conspiracy and people such as yourself need to take your Haldol more frequently.
Answer in my view is E.
and We need to keep fighting to keep these religious fascists from furthering their cause around the world. You idiots in the bush hate squad reel against people like Eric Rudolph, David Koresh as religious fanatics.
As I recall from the 2003 invasion and reports I've read is that we've found several tons of Sarin and Mustard gas, So your WMD argument is baseless. I also recall reading the 9/11 commission report that indicated that Al Quada has set up training camps in Northern Iraq, so the "lack of connection" argument you state is baseless too.
These are individuals. the Islamic fascists backed by Iran now, are a danger for the whole world and have been so since the 1970s when Carter's spineless policies of non-engagement created this monster.
2006-09-29 04:18:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
This is a response to Slim Whitman's answer.
The way Haldol works is actually similar to Sarin.
This and you condemn chemical weapons.I guess domestic terrorism committed by the 'authorities' is ok.I really wanted to ignore it, but the arrogance and hypocrisy of that answer was far beyond simple exaggeration.Your insensitivity is disgusting,and your enthrallment with bipartisan 'reality' is what is truly delusional.
2013-09-18 12:27:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by DanM 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not believe Bush and his pals regarding 9/11 or Iraq... I do not think it was a bad thing to attack Afghanistan.
2006-09-29 04:08:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Todd Maz 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Absolutely not. I do not believe the administration. I feel that the public has been blatently lied to. Many facts have been twisted or erased. I think that Americans deserve to know what really happened that day- Not a half truth or what the administration thinks we need to hear... THE TRUTH!
In any debate of a whodunit ask yourself this one simple question-
"WHO STANDS TO GAIN?"
Now you have your answer...
But the truth is: I highly doubt we will ever know the complete truth of what happened that day. Speaking as someone who was in NYC the day of the attacks (I was in Times Square and my brother was working across the street from the WTC)... that day haunts me and I so badly want to know what went on, behind the scenes, September 11th, 2001.
2006-09-29 04:17:30
·
answer #11
·
answered by atwr85 1
·
1⤊
2⤋