Do you think that Mr. Bush or the next president that get elected should follow with this crasy idea being created behind the back of the American people. I know for a fact that the Mexican will love it. America what's going on.
2006-09-29 03:58:12 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think it would mean war here at home. I really hope they come to their senses. They are already planning this. It isn't just Bush either. I wish it were, then when he is out of office it would go away, but alas we are in for the fight of our lives in the not distant future
For those that scoff at this, the idea is already in the active stages. It will begin with the trans Texas corridor, linking Mexico by dedicated highway and rail, directly to Canada in time. The idea is for there to be the North American Union, like Europe.
Lots of articles on this all over the place
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50451
2006-09-29 04:06:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It is an already done deal...there are 2000 pages of NAFTA that have been kept secret. GATT also plays a role but I do not know what. Those 2000 pages are supposed to remove the borders between Canada, The USA, and Mexico. When that happens all the states, provinces and Territories of Canada will loose their Provence or state name. There will be 10 units which have already been decided. You will not be allowed outside your unit without the proper papers.
I have been hearing about these 2000 pages for about 8 years now. I personally believe that it could well happen by the end of 2007, before Bush leaves office and the new president is sworn in. Bush wants to be dictator over the global unit #1.
I will list one source below. If you should want more....email me and I will supply you with them.
2006-09-29 04:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by pinelake302 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I never heard this. Quote sources. Republicans have no interest in having Mexico or Canada as part of the US. There would be a flood of liberals and Republicans would not be able to have a majority. Do you ever think before asking stupid questions?
2006-09-29 04:07:20 · answer #3 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it really isn't any longer only in Haiti and China. nutrients expenditures right here contained in the U. S. have skyrocketed contained in the superb various weeks. it really is as a results of three diverse aspects. a million. gasoline expenditures: each little thing comes into your interior sight grocery through a truck. commercial diesel expenditures are more beneficial even than gas, even tho diesel calls for far less refining than gas. no longer only are the oil organizations gouging motor vehicle drivers, they are *somewhat* gouging the truckers. 2. Farm subsidies: Farmers are paid *no longer* to advance flora. the authorities. calls for them to allow a particular quantity of acreage to lie fallow, to stay away from "glutting the marketplace with product" and "to shop expenditures of yank grain aggressive with the international marketplace". 3. climatic situations: there has been flooding specially elements of the rustic, which maximum likely destroyed many flora. i changed into in my small interior sight grocery the day earlier on the on the spot. I requested the shop proprietor if he envisioned expenditures coming lower go into reverse any in any respect. each little thing has more beneficial in value contained in the superb few weeks. In my shop, many products went up one entire dollar in accordance to merchandise interior per week. A pound of espresso went from $4.ninety 9 to 5.ninety 9 in a single day. A can of vegetable shortening went from 3.ninety 9 to 4.ninety 9. A bag of flour that would nicely be had a month in the past for $0.ninety 9 is now almost $3.00. My grocer suggested he would not anticipate *something* taking position in value. i'm making waiting to start up my own small farm. i'm gonna purchase 2 calves, some chickens, plant a vegetable backyard, and attempt to work out how self sustaining i will change into. i can not have sufficient money those grocery expenditures *and* the fee of gasoline.
2016-11-25 02:24:23 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a megalomaniac who thinks he's in office to play a big game of Risk. The rest of the [sane] world knows that having a unique country with the morals and ethics our forefathers intended is ideal, though I doubt it will ever be that way again with all the political correctness and greedy politicians giving in to the squeaky wheel minority who want to change our history to suit their uber-sensitive whims.
2006-09-29 04:08:31 · answer #5 · answered by dbackbarb 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The idea, as dangerous as it sounds, isn't half bad, given we follow the right procedures. As long as we don't just act imperialist and try to enslave everyone or force the Mexicans to speak English as they were forced to speak their current language by the Spanish conquerors.
2006-09-29 04:50:20 · answer #6 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who gave you this information?
It sounds like yet another conspiracy theory.
It will never happen as you have described it.
Maybe you are thinking about a North American alliance similar to Europe.
2006-09-29 04:08:37 · answer #7 · answered by William T 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't heard of that. Hmmm, The United States of Amcanico.
2006-09-29 04:21:44 · answer #8 · answered by faversham 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would envision Quebec and Mexico going to war immediately.
2006-09-29 07:05:18 · answer #9 · answered by Ernie F 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a CANADIAN I say ...........over my dead body .But it doesnt matteranyway.Our stupid Prime minister just caved in on the softwood lumber issue and now we are in Afghanistan doing I dont know what
2006-09-29 04:27:40 · answer #10 · answered by Paul I 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋