Well instead of their terrorism here, they have OUR terrorism there. Doesn't make me particularly proud of this country. So much money and resources have been directed toward that end that huge social issues are being pushed aside that claim more lives than terrorists in this country ever have, drunk drivers to mention but one, (mis-) managed health care for another.
2006-09-29 03:14:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by finaldx 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not at all. All 16 of the intelligence agency's have come out and said the the war in Iraq has created more terrorist. We have made things worse. George Bush is probably the best recruiter that al quida has.
2006-09-29 10:03:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No.
Also, a message to poster 'You're missing the point'. You seem to think that not having had any terror attacks means that the war has made us safer.
I've got a pair of jeans that stops terrorism. I bought them in October 2001 and there hasn't been a single act of terorrism in the US since, so I can only assume that they're working. You can have them for $500.
2006-09-29 10:11:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by raisingtheblinds 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course not. Any truly thinking and aware person would say the same thing. Even the latest NIE - National Intelligence Estimate said so. For all you republicans that is the document the US intelligence agencies give as a brief to the president. Also for republicans - when its six o'clock the big hand is on the twelve and the little hand is on the six.
2006-09-29 10:05:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by pointingdevices 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is impossible to know how many American deaths Bush's illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq will cause.
Bush is breeding a new generation of 'kill Americans first" radical Muslims. The blood from those they eventually kill (and that their children kill,..., and their children's children..., will be on Bush's hands.
*******************************
you're_missing_a_screw & doc8 -
How many attacks during Clinton's term (except the one 38 days after he took office).
Only weeks after Clinton took office in 1993 (following 12 straight years of Republican presidents), terrorist scum tried to bring down the towers.
What did Clinton do?
- within a month, four people were arrested,
- they went on trial that September,
- the trial lasted 6 months, and
- they were all convicted
Are you aware that Clinton stopped eight 9/11-size attacks, despite a Republican Congress that tried to stop his every move?
Are you aware that the very first thing that Clinton did, as he was leaving the White House and Bush was moving in, was to tell Bush that the single greatest threat to the safety of the American people was Osama Bin-Laden. He had his staff stress to Bush’s staff that this was the most important thing Bush needed to know now that he was President.
Are you aware that on August 6, 2001, Bush received a PDBM (President's Daily Briefing Memo) warning that:
- OBL was planning an attack inside the United States, and
- that he might use airplanes, and
- that the targets would be politically important (DC) and major metropolitan centers (NYC)?
Are you aware that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the Bush administration ignored the memo?
Are you aware that the Bush administration abandoned the Israeli – Palestinian issue?
Are you aware that Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade Iraq which, according to your own Republican Congress’s report on pre-war intelligence:
- there were NO terrorists in Iraq before Bush invaded
- there was no connection between Iraq and OBL, AQ, or any terrorist organization
- Hussein did not provide training camps to terrorists
- Hussein hated AQ before we did
- Hussein did not hide al-Zargawi - he tried to have him arrested
Are you aware that the Taliban are stronger in Afghanistan now than they were before Bush invaded?
That opium production is Afghanistan is at record levels and the money from it fills terrorist’s pockets.
Are you aware that Bush is losing in Iraq?
Are you aware that Bush is losing the war on terror?
Are you aware that Bush has destroyed America’s dignity, honor, and reputation?
2006-09-29 10:03:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Safer and kept the media busy.....I can get on a bus without concern it will blow up, oh wait, that never happened here....well, I can walk by a car without concern it will explode.....oh, wait, that wasnt here either.....hmmmm.....I can get on a plane and not fear domestic flight.....oh wait, that only happened once......crap.....I cant think of anything...oh wait I can run with a pencil in my hand without fear of tripping...well, can kill a man for trying..that only happens in the middle east......have a great weekend.......
2006-09-29 10:00:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by lost&confused 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it has put is in more harm, the war and the president are pissing so many other countries off that before long, something else really bad is going to happen.
2006-09-29 09:59:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
look, no war can make us safer! it terrrifies everyone because they know a war can break out anytime where they live... kids can be taken away from their parents, people dying....nobody wants that, and i'm sure u don't either!
2006-09-29 10:00:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by TT 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not according to the people who analyze such things
If Bush were president in WWII, when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, he would have invaded Thailand
2006-09-29 10:00:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not according the national intelligence agencies of the united states. Of course that means nothing to king Bush. He still says he would go in. Idiot
2006-09-29 09:59:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fire_God_69 5
·
2⤊
1⤋