English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-29 00:53:13 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

according to me

one is fire and other is water

2006-09-29 00:53:48 · update #1

11 answers

Hussey

2006-09-29 01:03:37 · answer #1 · answered by jason 2 · 0 1

Andrew Symonds

2006-09-29 07:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by 007 3 · 1 0

Just I've to say is "Never judge a book from its cover."

Hussey is so far so good, but this short tenure is just like a cover to a book, his actual story has yet to begin, and will surely begin in the upcoming Ashes.

But as a cricketer he is a great asset for Australian cricket, he has performed in both forms of the game (unlike Symonds who have somehow failed to proev himself as a good test player). So lets wish him best of luch for the Ashes. And lets hope from a dazzling performance by him...

2006-09-29 13:32:31 · answer #3 · answered by Ω Nookey™ 7 · 0 0

There is no comparison between them Hussey is the most consistent player his average shows that.

2006-09-29 09:44:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

now a days it seems that Symonds dosen't like his bat.............and played just one innings good...............................so i will go with Hussey as he also became a good captain......and tried to save Australia when they were sinking

2006-09-29 08:36:26 · answer #5 · answered by nickless 4 · 0 0

symonds

2006-09-29 08:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by sowmya 2 · 0 0

symonds

2006-09-29 07:56:23 · answer #7 · answered by Niranjan 3 · 1 0

Batsmen...

2006-09-29 08:00:18 · answer #8 · answered by Laura P 3 · 0 1

Is this a question?!?

HUSSEY RULES!!!

2006-09-29 07:56:54 · answer #9 · answered by jenieatworld 3 · 0 2

hussey!!

2006-09-29 10:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by aki 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers