I have no kids myself, but if I did I still don't think I would simply because there is enough upset in the world without forcing it in their faces.
2006-09-27 23:59:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No - disaster tourism (man-made or oherwise) is appalling.
I would rather take my daughter to see an inspiring and magnificent spectable - not something so awful.
Edit - Oops! Didn't realise you meant the film initially. No I wouldn't - my daughter is too young. I think also that 12 is too young and 15 would be better. Can we not let our children have childhoods before they are fully exposed to the horrors of the world?
2006-09-28 04:45:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nicola L 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because I don't want them to watch and believe the film shows it's the 'truth' of what actually happened... And the fact that they have made a film so soon after the event seems a bit sick and cynical to me, as well as disrespectful to those that died. So no I wouldn't let them watch it, and it wouldn't be because of the death and destruction - because that isn't the point.
I guess it's too much like propaganda for me - and I'm sick of Americans rewriting history in movies.
2006-09-28 04:59:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Marbard 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Surely the film can't be any more graphic than the images seen on TV. I think the film should be seen by however wants to see it. As for my kids seeing it? Well they can't cuz they're too young, but when it's out on DVD and they want to see it, then yeah, they can watch it..
2006-09-28 04:46:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥ Nicola ♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am 14 and personally i would not want to go and see world trade centre.
2006-09-28 05:57:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by louise 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hang on a mo, I thought that those danged ragheads had blown them up?
2006-09-28 04:54:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Pretorian 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
no they see enough death and distruction on the news.
2006-09-28 05:34:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by all heart 1
·
0⤊
0⤋