2006-09-27 19:31:18 · 24 answers · asked by siva 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
no
2006-09-28 18:19:43 · answer #1 · answered by Cricket Fan 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think sreesanth is better because he is getting set in the team day by day,while vrv singh is not
2006-09-28 06:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by Niyas 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no not at all. because vrv singh takes wickets rarely. and he gives more runs. but sreesanth takes wickets commonly and gives low runs. so the result comes that sreesanth is better
2006-09-28 03:26:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no!!! i don't think so cuz he has not played many matches so it is difficult to judge!vrv singh has a good line and length and of course speed but, he is not so good in taking wickets!!
i mean he is not able to take wickets against a good team!!u can watch his matches in which he has not performed well but,sreesanth has got high speed good feilding hand and is also able to take wickets!!!sreesanth is definitely a good player than vrv singh!!!
2006-09-28 08:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by aki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now if u talk about height and weight yes he is better than sreesanth or better than any bowler in our side as he can use his personality to bowl faster than others.But if u speak about performances neither he has taken any wickets or able to keep runrate low....even his speed is just average which was not expected . I guess if this way youngsters will perform...we will soon see old faces back in team leaving Munaf no is looks promosing as being rated by all.
2006-09-28 02:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by hotgy4999 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no,sreesanth is better then vrv singh
he is more fast,accurate than vrv singh and his action is also better
he sometimes bats well
2006-09-28 14:48:43 · answer #6 · answered by siddharth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no sreesanth is better than vrv singh
2006-09-28 06:56:04 · answer #7 · answered by sinu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sreesanth is better . he is wicket taking bowler.
he control the run flow in last 10 overs
2006-09-28 05:15:18 · answer #8 · answered by SACHIN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sreesanth is comparatively better
2006-09-28 04:13:03 · answer #9 · answered by Kiran Kumar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope sreesanth is better or they are the same.
2006-09-28 08:55:25 · answer #10 · answered by jal t 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i don't think vrv has reached the level of Sreesanth
2006-09-28 06:44:09 · answer #11 · answered by nickless 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋