Nietzsche and beyond good and evil?

Question

what are the master and slave moralities in beyond good and evil?

Answer 1

Nietzsche himself was beyond good and evil because he suffered from dementia caused by tertiary syphilis. "Master and Slave Morality" was one of his schizophrenic fantasies.

All morality is relative; there's no point in trying to focus on the moralities of two arbritraily defined personality types, since neither the types nor their moralities exist as absolutes.

Rather than attempt to take Nietzsche seriously, try this route to an understanding of moral philosophy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_philosophy

"Good" luck!

Answer 2

Ignore the simplistic rant above. Nietzsche actually is advocating a moral standard of a sort, just not the traditional (Judeo-Christian) sort. It isn't relativism per se.

He's basically saying this: In ancient times, for example in Ancient Egypt, the virtuous person was the person who was strong, proud, determined, and cunning. Those are the qualities that the Master has, hence the Master Morality. To be a good person was, to the Master, to have those character traits above.

The Slave Morality is the opposite. The slaves (Nietzche is talking about the Israelites in Ancient Egypt specifically) stress virtues like meekness, humility, deference, and submission. Those qualities, like those of the Master, reflect the lives of the people who tout them. These are the qualities stressed by the Judeo-Christian tradition, which Nietzche was against.

He thought that we should drop the slave morality and adopt the master morality, that we should try to be extraordinary, "will yourself to power" and all that jazz. So you see, he isn't a relativist, or he really wouldn't care which morality we adopted.

I'm not saying I agree, I'm just saying what he said.

Answer 3

each logician has his own ideas and evaluations. very resembling a set of blind adult adult males attempting to make sure out the type of an elephant. Nietzsche's idea isn't absolute. if you're new to philosophy, reading previous sturdy and Evil through Nietzsche first earlier each little thing else will impregnate his conception gadget into you and go away a miles extra significant mark than would different philosophers. i'd advise you to study books on ordinary philosophy that designate in short each and each of the philosophers and their ideas earlier getting into for a deeper study. in the different case, you'll only finally end up poisoning your ideas with unfaithful "absolutes", in case you comprehend what I mean. Edit: Human psychology is this variety of fashion that the first actual publicity to something (inspite of it really is) will go away the most impression, compared to the 2d publicity, or third, and so on. So from the first publicity, the ideas will be strongly connected to it, and could be a lot less yielding to new and extra ideal ameliorations provided (2d or third exposures), and so progression commonly will change into stuck with the first publicity. i do not ideas in case you insist on reading "previous sturdy and Evil" first no matter if you're only new to this, because it is your ideas, no longer mine. yet I nevertheless advise you to study the overall philosophy first earlier going deeper from there.

Answer 4

Techniques To Reverse Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

Answer 5

Nietzsche, fantasies should not have to much read into them, whilst very ill ,he formulated and proposed lots of reasonings that do not stand up to rational debate. regards LF

Answer 6

Whoa, nellie...you're obviously operating on some much higher plane than I am; sorry!