into the building, yet the lawn is in pristine condition and there is no plane wreckage on the grass?
2006-09-27 18:30:10 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I didnt read the entire report, but I have read parts of it. You can read it online if you want.
2006-09-27 18:40:11 · update #1
There is no concrete/ pavement where the plane hit. There is a grass lawn.
2006-09-27 18:41:27 · update #2
The entire 9/11 conmission report is just a bunch of lies to cover up the fact that it was an inside job.
There was no plane at the Pentagon - it had to be a missile of some kind.
2006-09-30 16:33:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
4 factors: a million. The Pentagon did not have many cameras previous to 9/11; they depended on secure practices officers. Why? The cameras did not stop intruders. in case you had to sneak into the Pentagon, which of those might stop you: a digital camera or an armed shield? 2. Surveillance cameras are designed to capture autos and people. not planes fly 500+ miles in line with hour. i'm unable to even get a sparkling photograph of my baby on Halloween. 3. Is the launch of "mystery tapes" going to remedy something? we've intense high quality photos of Flight a hundred seventy five hitting the international commerce center, yet there are nonetheless people who say there wasn't any plane. 4. There has in basic terms been ONE photograph released of yank airlines Flight 587 crashing into the floor in Queens, long island. guess what...it wasn't a sparkling photograph. is that this a conspiracy too?
2016-12-15 15:54:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you watch the same video I did? It looked like the plane hit concrete / pavement just in front of the entrance and exploded. The inertia of the plane would have sent all the wreckage forward into the building not out onto the lawn.
2006-09-27 18:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by roamin70 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I hate answering a question with a question but why do conspiracy goofs develop these wild theories...did you read the 9/11 report or did you get this off some goofy blog? To be honest I haven't read it either....
2006-09-27 18:33:56 · answer #4 · answered by loofa36 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
BEcause they lied there was no plane it was a misile and the government was behind the whole thing
2006-09-27 18:32:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
thats because the bush administration covered it up. that video is a fake IMPEACH BUSH PLEASE
2006-09-27 19:10:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋