Once again, Former President Clinton wagging his finger with righteous indignation and once again, Hillary Clinton rushing to his defense, was a big mistake and will apparently cost Far Left Wing Liberal Democrats dearly in 40 days.
This act is getting old and the American people realize it and apparently are beginning to see through the Clinton charades.
The Wienhauser-Phillips Poll as of 9-27-06 shows that those "Undecided Voters" surveyed immediately after the FOX News Chris Wallace -Clinton interview Sunday, registered a highly unfavorable reaction to Bill Clinton's outburst and now perceive the Democrats to offer no better or any stronger position on Terror and National Security than Republican incumbent policies.
Panicked Damage Control efforts by Carvel and Paul Bagala completely sidestepping the President of the DNC Howard Dean, further illustrates the diasarray, distrust and confusion Left Wing Liberals are registering after Clinton's wild-eyed outburst.
2006-09-27 18:03:17 · 29 answers · asked by B'klyn Barracuda 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think you said it well - might I add I gave printed copies to a couple of undecided voters. Isn't the Internet great.
2006-09-27 18:11:21 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think that most people who have read the 9-11 comission report know full well that former President, Bill Clinton did not do all that he claims in trying to capture UBL. The report is quite clear in that regard.
I think that those who have not read the report but have seen the full interview with Wallace saw former President Clinton become very defensive and they wondered why? Why such an outburst? Why such a vigorous tirade against poor Chris Wallace? And people put two and two together and said, "Hmmm if he really did what he claimed, and if he really was not at all at fault for 9-11 then he wouldn't have done what he did just then..."
It remains to be seen how the election will turn out, but it amazes me how with President Bush's poll numbers being so low recently the vote was still equally split. One would think that with Bush at an all time low more people would be jumping on the Democrat bandwagon, but it just didn't happen, which tells us that even undecided moderates don't have much faith in the Democrats and their far left views.
2006-09-28 01:12:31 · answer #2 · answered by AirborneSaint 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Whilst you can argue that it may cost in the upcoming election(Democrats)Bill Clinton can offer an opinion like anyone else. Asking such a question as that barely leaves ground for anyone to give a decent answer. He is no longer the President and if he feels so passionately about about what he might have done it never got to that!!
George Bush on the other hand told deliberate lies to go in there(Iraqu)& has done every god damn thing you can do to foster terrosim.
The Middle East war is do with 2 sects.The Seiks & Muslims nothing else... They used to live in peace then one lot to greedy and wanted more, the result has accelarated into this crap co's George thought he could go in and overlay it all with his oil hunting expedition... Well we know what happened from there dont we !!!!!
2006-09-28 01:17:58 · answer #3 · answered by evek 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Did you notice that Billy kept referring to Richard Clark's book to back up his "facts"? He couldn't find someone a little less biased to quote? Why was it ok for him to physically touch Wallace? Wasn't it Hillary who screamed about Lazio "invading her personal space" when he approached her on stage at a debate? The question was a perfectly legitimate one, something many people wanted to know. The problem is the Clintons are not used to answering real questions. They are used to softballs from the "main streamed" Clinton loving media. He fell apart because someone dared to ask the "Great White Hope" a difficult question. He looked like a weak fool. All of you who think he was a great leader really should get some counseling, he tore this country apart....that's when it started.
2006-09-28 01:39:27 · answer #4 · answered by Cinner 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why don''t you leave Bill along.. He was The best President, we ever had..What Bill did wasn't none of our business. All you people with out sin.. Speak now!!!! He was only human. It is only Hillary and Bill's..Business!!!!! He was a good President. The truth will come out!!! I don't see how Bush sleeps at night.. He is a so dishonest. And, as smart as a rock. That was a set up.. Who would leave something like that on their dress. Would you wash it? And, don't give me that thing about, he was in office when it happened.. Dose he not get a day off??.. Poor Bush. had to cut his 100th vacation short.. Did you ever notice how many vacations Bush gets? I could only wish. I got half of that.. And, as far as abortion is concerned.. Bush is in peoples personal a fares. They will pay for their on sin. Who is Bush, to tell them what they can do? People that don't want babies. Will only neglect them and abuse them.. Wake up.
2006-09-28 11:11:04 · answer #5 · answered by Daris G 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do all the Clinton haters seem so self righteous? Clinton has been out of office for five years; why don't you ask a question about one of our current president's tirades? He's the one leading the country, not Clinton!
Also, to call Clinton and all the Democrats far wing liberal Democrats is to mis-characterize the party, just as it is to call all Republicans as right wing - Christian conervatives. It's getting very old!
2006-09-28 01:09:45 · answer #6 · answered by Shelley 3 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Lots of wishful thinking and hyperbole here. I'm sure in your universe, Bush still has an 85% approval rating and the insurgency is still in its final throes.
With the death toll in Iraq and Afghanistan now surpassing the civilian death toll of 9-11, I would hold dearly to your delusions, let your Prozac bottle run empty.
God Bless!
(and God Bless Bill Clinton...this country's last REAL leader)
2006-09-28 01:13:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
He got pissed because he felt he had been baited and ambushed.
It bothered him that 9/11 ocurred knowing it might have been prevented if the CIA had got to bin laden.
There is enough documentation to prove that he allowed the CIA to hunt for bin laden so there should be no doubt about his efforts or his sincerity.
I do not approve of all that Clinton did but don't make up crap just to suit your slanted dislike.
2006-09-28 01:12:05 · answer #8 · answered by Harley Charley 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I think the interviewer lacked journalistic integrity. The interview was supposed to be about Mr. Clinton's charity work, and the man just sprung all these questions about national security and Bin Laden on him. Regardless of what you think of Clinton or his presidency, the interviewer showed a marked lack of respect for someone who has been the President of the United States of America and towards the office of the President in general.
2006-09-28 01:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by medellia1984 3 · 7⤊ 3⤋
No!
Not at all You just don't like it because he is plumb fed up with DFI's like you still blaming him even after 6 years of the DFI we have in office now!
PS
War aside, what has President Bush done for this country?
WHA? Did someone say PROZAC? Where?
2006-09-28 01:11:24 · answer #10 · answered by bconehead 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Bush should never been off the hook for 911. Notice he didn't even want to have the 911 commission set up to investigate his failures. He and Dick would not even testify under oath....you know why?? Because they didn't want the crap to fly back in their face.....So let me get this straight....If you take office and your national defense agency submits a memo saying "Bin Laden intent on attacking in the U.S." and you ignore it.... and 9 months into office the terrorists attack....You are not responsible???? How many times did Bush try to kill Bin Laden??? How about a BIG FAT ZERO!!!!!!!!!!!
You are a dilusioned conservative trying to post blame on the former administration....So sad...So lame!!! Grow up and take some responsibility.....Does your mother still dress you in the morning?
2006-09-28 02:10:49 · answer #11 · answered by dharmabear 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋