Does feminism equate to women who want to evade their gender role in society?

Question

First off I'm a 26 year old guy...and count myself as fairly liberal person (pro-choice, anti-war, etc etc). So please don't attack me as a woman hater = ).

It seems to me that feminists seem to miss the whole point of gender roles in the family. I don't think most men out there want to work and support the family, but they do it because its what is necessary. I've seen my father go to a job he's not crazy about for the past 20 years to support the family.

In my opinion most the arguments I've heard from feminists seem to lack a large degree of common sense on how the actual mechanics of a family should work. At the heart of the matter feminism seems to be very selfish, where the women would rather put herself in front of the needs of her family.

Answer 1

You make an interesting point here. The traditional gender roles in our society have all but evaporated. But both men and women should put thier families first. If you are trying to say a woman should stay home and cook and clean, that is not a good thing.

I have a theory that a lot of our problems in our society are due to the feminist movement. That being said, the way that women have been historically treated here and elsewhere are atrocious. But it seems to me once women became sexual liberated, so to speak, the moral compass of our country became forever altered. By that I mean, women found out they could be immorral, whereas before guys were kinda expected to be dirtballs (not that this is good either). Women being moral kept our society from getting really bad but I see today's women (or the perception you get from all the stuff we are bombarded with) as basically acting like men, and that is sad. I am not sure we are good with one type of person, we need female and male differences in our society.

Answer 2

I see it less completlely as a gender role issue and a supreme reluctance to compromise on behalf of femmenist . I am pro choice , im a straight but not narrow , i beleive gays and lesbians should be able to marry.

Having said that i feel the gender based femmenist have back stabbed there many male liberal supporters .Being a male in the 1980's and 1990's was a hellish experience .

Im a democrate i voted democrate Why did George Bush win 2 times.I part because he caters to the masculine side of the equation Im serously thinking voting republican in the next presidential election .I supported abortion rights in the past but f*ck it the next time i vote ill put in a vote for who ever has a platform based on equity femmenism and not gender based femmenism .

Answer 3

I happen to imagine gender roles run opposite to the animal instincts of human beings. Ergo, for me gender roles are a social construct. i imagine this kind because in the experience that they were innate then all adult males/women human beings in each human society through the span of time and area will be 'masculine' and 'female'---they are not. There are some societies in which the adult males were 'female' and the ladies human beings 'masculine' so this proves the maleability of the human ideas. Now, earlier human beings leap on me declaring 'yet adult adult males's and women human beings's brains are stressed in yet in a unique way/depending in yet in a unique way'---nicely of route. anybody's mind is structurally/chemically unique. No 2 adult adult males's brains react an identical way and and so on. also---the mind is somewhat trainable and malleable--so, if someone is conditioned in a particular way---then the elements of the mind will advance/decrease in accordance to that---which may account for the adjustments between adult adult males and women human beings's brains that persons imagine are 'innate'. I also imagine that anybody is born with their own unique temperaments as a results of their genes and their human being body chemistry (independant of their sex chromosomes)---so some are extra hardwired to reveal characteristics we see as 'masculine' or 'female'---yet therein lies the precedence. No characteristics are literally 'masculine' or 'female' we've taken completely sturdy impartial personality characteristics and utilized labels to them---making the entire idea of 'masculinity' and 'feminity' social constructs--it somewhat is why 'gender roles' (the way that each and each organic and organic sex is meant to act, imagine and so on) are social constructs to me. And to Adolphus: at the same time as will you comprehend that gender id is punctiliously seperate from sexual orientation?---for this reason lesbian women anybody is *no longer* through default 'masculine'. someone will be 'masculine' or 'female' no matter if or not they are gay, heterosexual, bisexual or asexual.

Answer 4

What are you referring to? Should she work? Yes, if she wants to work. Should you both share household chores? Yes, of course. What do you want? Her barefoot and pregnant.