if data fromrepeated experiment don't support the hypothesis, the next step?

Answer 1

if data from repeated experiment don't support the hypothesis then your hypothesis is wrong. go back to the drawing board and make a new hypothesis keeping in mind all that went wrong.

Answer 2

A detailed analysis of the data is made. Possible unknown sources of error are looked for.

If you are a professional scientist, you will attempt to interpret your results and publish the negative results with your interpretation. This is an important step.

This will either lead to a new experimental design or a New Hypothesis.

If this is a question about how the scientific method works in the real world, then these are the typical steps:
1) Observation
2) Hypothesis
3) Prediction
4) Experiment
5) Analysis
6) Conclusion
7) Report

The experiment is prove or disprove the prediction and only indirectly the hypothesis. If the experiment does not support the prediction, it might be the prediction at fault, not the hypothesis.

Answer 3

What we tend to do in psychology is... counting on what proportion circumstances you ran the test and found that your hypothesis to be inncorrect, you ought to prefer settle for the null hypothesis and run with this line of theory on your write up. evaluate all the achievable the clarification why your findings did not prove how expected and criticise and evaluate your learn against different previous learn. attempt to describe why they found out what they did and why your test did not. i would not provide up, yet accepting the null hypothesis ought to be the right decision counting on what proportion circumstances you had run the test, e.g. if it had purely been two times, those may well be anomalous findings, although in case you will run it 50 or one hundred circumstances, then the possibilities are high that someplace some thing has long gone incorrect. Did you account for all variables that would impression your findings? Did you suited administration them? you ought to then prefer to look into greater and doubtless attempt an opposing kind. Does this instruct what your previous findings ought to not? you would be able to additionally deliver on your previous findings and learn this on your new findings. What component to technological know-how you're experimenting in? this would clearly variety between different technological know-how matters, in psychology, we would not tend to revise the hypothesis till the pilot learn extra approximately very unusual findings/in spite of each thing experiments have been performed and a write up has been carried out. If we would prefer to look into greater, shall we then adjust the hypothesis for a clean learn. The above is what I easily have familiar to be elementary technique in psychology experiments (yet i'm purely an undergrad so do not quote me on something!) desire it enables?

Answer 4

Change the hypothesis, of course.

Answer 5

What hypotheses will the data support?

Answer 6

It seems to be time for a new theory.

Answer 7

there must have been unnoticed errors try again

Answer 8

repeat it