i just saw it from Mugglenet.com. 2 picks from movie production.
2006-09-27 17:23:41 · 15 answers · asked by David A 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I'm happy, I was a bit worried that he would look too old. He does look a little old but I don't think it will be a problem and is definitely preferable to changing actors. Hopefully, they will keep making the films fast enough so that he doesn't get too much older.
2006-09-27 17:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I LOVE Harry Potter. And I must say that its true about picturing the characters when you read the books. It makes the books come to life being able to know the decription of who the people are. I am so glad that all the actors are the same (with the exception of the death of the guy who played the first Dumbledor). I am a fan of Ron though..
2006-09-27 17:36:26 · answer #2 · answered by meg 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am- although I didn't know that there was any question about it. I do wonder if he'll ever have any other sucess besides being Harry- maybe it'll be too hard for people to see him any other way? But I see the actors faces in my mind as I read the books- so if they tried to change actors I would be quite upset!! Anyone else hope for more than 7 books....?
2006-09-27 17:29:49 · answer #3 · answered by DukeGirl72 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think hes a really wooden actor, and they could find someone much better than him to play Harry Potter, but still the books are millions of times better than the films because the films keep missing out important parts!
2006-09-27 21:23:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i can see that actors don't want to play the same character over and over, it would get boring. but, yeah, i'm glad he is staying harry!!! it would be nice if they keep on the same cast for each movie, it's never the same when they have someone else play a part you identify as looking like someone else. and unlike some people say...the ones who complain that the actors are getting too old to play the parts...they are only a couple fo years older and there are actors who play roles 10-15 years younger than they are. plus they are teenagers and even in the books they are going through puberty, it's okay for them to grow!!
2006-09-28 10:12:16 · answer #5 · answered by bored_ass_little_girl 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Right over here !!! it wouldnt be the same if anyone else played 'harry potter' everyone is used to seeing him in that role..and its so neat watching him and his friends growing up .. and Daniel is such a handsome young man and a very talented actor too !!!
2006-09-27 17:55:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
no it really is worry-free to ever fill in daniel radcliffe portraying harry potter's function..he's sturdy at it..once you're gazing the action picture, it appears like you're reading the e book through ways he act and emote on each scene..if daniel somewhat couldn't play anymore, they ought to search for yet another who would nicely be as sturdy or a lot extra extra ideal than him...,
2016-11-24 23:50:46 · answer #7 · answered by fullem 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i am glad hes in the 5th one, they should keep him on until the last one because you get used to him being harry and if they used another actor it wouldnt be the same daniel radcliffe will be on bbc1 tonight on a show called extras i think its at 9pm.
2006-09-27 20:20:17 · answer #8 · answered by Gerards twin 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Though he can be a bit wooden theres a nice familiarity about him playing harry. I cant imagine anyone else playing the role at this stage.
2006-09-27 21:12:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who else were they gonna get? They would be idiots to change the main characters, heck, the people on jump street and 90210 were in their thirties playing high schoolers.
2006-09-27 17:41:24 · answer #10 · answered by Niche Jerk 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋