Bush is an ***. And stop using Mexico to beat up on that fool they've been through enough.
2006-09-27 17:00:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by CALAVA 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Invading Mexico would not result in the creation of terrorists. It happened before. Read your history. Large-scale terrorism is a primarily muslim phenomenon. Everybody else has the sense to realize it doesn't really work.
And we have been attacked by terrorists since long before we ever invaded a middle eastern country.
If our war in Iraq created more terrorists, it only brought them out in the open, which is good for us. Given the choice of half a million angry terrorists shooting at us in Iraq, or eight suicidal hijackers living among us, I choose the former. At least you know where they are.
2006-09-27 17:07:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Privratnik 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Probably not, but we'll be invading Iran soon so watch out. The terrorists will come!
Privratni...But can you say for sure you "know" where they are, there are terrorists among us just waiting for their orders. And, no, we had never been attacked by terrorists until we started meddling in other countries business.
Besides isn't "Bush Logic" an oxymoron.
2006-09-27 17:03:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Is Mexico new on the Axis of Evil? Do they have some new oil? Does Donald Rumsfeld dislike them? These are questions that must be addressed in Bush logic.
2006-09-27 17:02:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes! We can then create a new Homeland of Mexico dept. Have lots of new jobs...then outsource em all...? Or put Mexicans in USA Homeland Security & have Americans in the Dept of Mexico...isn't that what Globalization is about? ;P
I got one, how about have disabled people with attitude problems doing Customer Service jobs?
Wait we already have this...Washington DC.
Hmm if you invade Mexico, then have rules of disengagement (you can't fire unless your taco tastes bad) we can have a war forever!
Much lo siento amigos...es comico...
2006-09-27 17:11:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That would be Bush logic alright. And I get your point. We are NOT safer now than we were before 9/11.
2006-09-27 17:00:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Using Bush logic will be most unreasonable thing to do.
2006-09-27 17:21:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by SS 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Its not the terrorist that scare me, it's the freak that wants to control the oil reserves that leaves me a little chilly. He needed to be taken out.
2006-09-27 17:11:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Miss Candi 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
That's right - so we don't have to fight them here! Cause then we'd be there. And not here. Where they are. To keep us safe here. And them there.
That's the plan.
2006-09-27 17:04:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
they are already terrorist with them dam refried beans, ask fatass mike moore
2006-09-27 17:03:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋