Opinion on civil and common law, what do India follows?

Question

whether India follows civil law or continental law?

Answer 1

The common law constitutes the basis of the legal systems of: England and Wales, the Republic of Ireland, federal law in the United States and the states' laws (except Louisiana), federal law in Canada and the provinces' laws (except Quebec civil law), Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Brunei, Pakistan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and many other generally English-speaking countries or Commonwealth countries. Essentially, every country which has been colonised at some time by Britain uses common law except those that had been colonized by other nations, such as Quebec (which follows French law to some extent) and South Africa (which follows Roman Dutch law), where the prior civil law system was retained to respect the civil rights of the local colonists. India's system of common law is also a mixture of English law and the local Hindu law.

You want more deep knowledge about above please refer to site :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law

Answer 2

Neither. It follows .. quiet anarchy. Anarchy in the way the masses are treated by the dons of the subcontinent - dons include the politicians, and the soon-to-be politicians (sorry, if this reference is obtuse, but you can figure it out). In fact it amazes me how the country runs .. on inertia of movement? Law enforcement authority's figureheads are sitting on a pile of wealth way beyond their means - if you can explain how they got so rich, then you would already know the answer to this question.

Answer 3

For starters please do not do what the guy above has suggested. You cant marry somebody else if you're all waiting married. Your fiancee will be prosecuted for adultery and also you could flow to penal complicated for bigamy. You cant trust the note of your ex. human beings can get very vindictive in a divorce and it will be stupid to anticipate he would cooperate. A mutual consent divorce is the fastest. it is going to take 6 months. you could ought to flow to courtroom two times and usually, it really is it. there are various unscrupulous legal experts, something all of us understand. Legally no it really is worry-free to do something to cut back the time, please do not get determined. As in accordance to the present legal status 6 months is the minimum time. in the previous courts were giving a waiver to the mandatory 6 month era. in spite of the indisputable fact that after a superb courtroom ruling no courtroom contained in the rustic provides you with a divorce for lower than a 6 month era in accordance to mutual consent. in case you've not lived at the same time contained in the previous 2 years, you could frame of mind a legal professional and report for divorce on grounds of desertion. Its conceivable that in case you plead with the choose he would agree although very not likely. Whats the large deal? Cant your fiancee anticipate a pair of added months. Why does it must be only in December. If he is going to marry somebody else in the experience that your divorce cant happen earlier the legal quarantine i'd advise you should no longer marry him. No legal professional can cut back the time period and as in accordance to the present legal gadget neither can a choose.