English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is the democratic elite,heros of the left.Idols to those who's only issue is Bush lied when he only said what they had two years earlier.

2006-09-27 16:45:29 · 13 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Ted Kennedy,Bill Clinton,Robert Byrd.

2006-09-27 16:55:11 · update #1

13 answers

You know what is pathetic? I thought you were telling a joke but your serious. No I don't want them to run this country. They sound like parrots...bauch...Bush lied...bauch. Then you go back & find this:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of
mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18,
1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl
Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports
indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to
pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that
will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bus h, Signed by Sen.
Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace
and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations. "We have
known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass
destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons
of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also
should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN
resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and
will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,
2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has,
and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of
mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the
threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2006-09-27 16:57:02 · answer #1 · answered by Steven B 2 · 3 1

The anti-war people in the Vietnam era were dead wrong but romanticized (though in that one, the pro-war people were largely wrong, too!) and the young and stupid think there's some equivalency. You also aren't in my town. A lot of people here aren't happy about the war either, but if anybody gave you grief here, you could sit back and watch the fireworks. It's hard to do, but try to remember when you run into these people that the opinion of a fool is just that. These people don't have a clue what counterinsurgency is about and don't care to find out. People who understand won't give you any trouble, whether they're for or against the war, and the people who don't understand aren't worth worrying about. Keep your head high, and thank you.

2016-03-18 02:09:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ok I know about Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd who is the rapist? Don't forget all the racists like Hillary and Joe Biden. All of them lie. Most of them have stock in oil and then talk about Bush being all about oil,like none of them have anything to gain when the prices go up. And I bet not one can tell you which president took us into vietnam. Then there is why did we attack Iraq when they didn't attack us. Who attacked us in WWI? How about WWII and Why did we attack Germany during that war? Who attacked us in Vietnam? Who attacked us in the first gulf war? They have many problems and wonder why they are unable to win an election. Do you think they will learn from their continuous mistakes before their party becomes no more?

2006-09-27 16:56:13 · answer #3 · answered by Wilkow Conservative 3 · 0 1

we are Republicans... resistance is futile.....

hhahaha... just a side note on the nature of your icon...

but this from the Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, George Allen and Scooter party... I didn't even have to go back 4 years to come up with my list... you went back 60 for one (that he's appologized for), 40 for the other (that was never proven), and 15 for the last (that was never proven)...

and even if they were true... at least those guys didn't graft the government/people with their misdeeds...

2006-09-27 17:12:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A small minority want these guys to run the country. The majority of the country only hear propaganda and never go research these criminals and therefore vote with their hearts instead of their brains.

That is our dilemma.

2006-10-01 05:23:53 · answer #5 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

But yet your ok wtih the racist George Allen right?

2006-09-27 16:54:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I agree with the first answer, who are u talking about.

2006-09-27 16:49:35 · answer #7 · answered by rockydriver22 5 · 1 1

Still not taking your medicine, huh?

2006-09-27 16:49:26 · answer #8 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 1 1

But Kennedy, Clinton, and Byrd are so patriotic.......

See you at the polls Republicans!!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-27 16:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by babe 2 · 0 3

Those are heroes to the commie libs!

2006-09-27 18:23:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Democrats are not like that! Now wheres my pants?

2006-09-27 16:48:52 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers