How would you expect global warming to affect the total amount of cloud cover on Earth?

Question

Global warming is expected to increase Earth's average temperature by up to a few degrees over the coming century...

Answer 1

Some people have thought if the earth generally got warmer, the waters comprising the oceans, rivers, lakes, & streams would see a net increase in temperature. Therefore, the evaporation from these waters(of course, the oceans & seas would be the greatest contributors) would increase, seemingly causing more clouds to form. However, I might think there would also be a net increase in wind velocities(caused by greater temperature differences in different parts of the earth) which would carry clouds from the oceans & seas quicker than at present(one effect of increasing wind velocity may be the seeming increase of hurricane spiral velocities). Once clouds are over land & encounter mountains, rains fall, effectively removing clouds from earth's skies quicker. Therefore, I might think that cloud percentages may go up very little if at all.

Answer 2

nicely, the eco-fearmongers favor you to trust that we will finally end up resembling the action picture Waterworld, yet contained in the clinical communities there remains very good debate occurring between the human beings who trust that it really is a classic earth cycle that lasts 1000 or so years and those that trust we are killing our planet. no matter if it really is us, then the doomsayers will be fairly precise. no matter if it really is a classic cycle, then we are able to probable see the extinction of a few species and the emergence of a few new species, both plant and animal. also, for a lengthy time period the tropical and temperate elements will boost in the route of the poles (north and south), and then it is going to quiet down again, possibly with yet another ice age. What extremely some human beings do not comprehend is that the earth isn't static, the position issues only change if we influence it. the international is continually replacing, and nature is somewhat adaptive. I somewhat doubt, as an celebration, that human-led to climate change killed the woolly massive. My intestine feeling depending on the arguments and "info" i have considered from each and each area is that what we are seeing is often ordinary earth cycle that we'd have sped up somewhat. in spite of the indisputable fact that, what converts lots of the earth's carbon dioxide to oxygen isn't land flora (no longer even the rain forests) yet algae contained in the oceans. at the same time as the earth receives hotter the algae grows extra without problem and eats extra carbon dioxide. sure, issues will change and particular we are able to work out some extinctions, in spite of the indisputable fact that it somewhat is ordinary besides. short of something like a international chemical or nuclear conflict I doubt we are able to somewhat do something to the earth that it ought to't cope with no longer that i'm in opt for of pollutants, yet calm and hassle-free experience receives us plenty further than this reactionary "we ought to make drastic ameliorations at the moment!" mentality.

Answer 3

it would probably increase due to higher humidity from melting ice at the poles eventually covering most of the planet