Unfortunately no!
2006-09-27 16:02:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's organic to assume that a liberal president will desire to nominate a liberal SCJ. possibilities are high, it may desire to nicely ensue too. inspite of the incontrovertible fact that, the Bork nomination, which in no way grew to alter into an appointment, has no longer been forgotten. and we've not forgotten the entire Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill charade, to objective to evade him from being appointed. possibly that's why the two area now has to lash out whilst the different area needs to nominate one in each and every of its very own, whilst an SCJ steps down. possibly all of it dates decrease back to Bork.
2016-12-12 16:29:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Justice Stevens is very old. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is no spring chicken anymore either.
2006-09-27 16:13:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by y_nevin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yea yea....can't wait for the Theocratic States of America.....boy are you neocons in for a big surprise!!!
2006-09-27 16:08:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by eantaelor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can't stand those activist, elected for life judges. Send me your resume.
2006-09-27 16:03:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Baby Shiraz 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fascist judges with no morals or conscience scare me, so I have to disagree with you.
2006-09-27 16:08:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hoping for someone to die is NOT a Christian value.
2006-09-27 16:00:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tofu Jesus 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep it would be nice
2006-09-27 16:06:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by james w 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
must be a neo-con neanderthal !!!!
2006-09-27 16:02:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i hope so
2006-09-27 16:01:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋