I'm sorry those are your only two choices for an answer. If you answer in a contrary manner, you will be disqualified, and it will be noted on your PERMANENT RECORD.
2006-09-27 15:48:50 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
This question was actually meant to poke fun at Libs, but the Cons here have by far given ths stupidest, most passionate answers. I guess it goes to show who holds the intelligence crucible here in the States. Sorry to have to say, but you Cons sound like a retarded bunch of hee-haw extras.
2006-09-27 16:15:47 · update #1
Clinton was the best ever.. No way to say he was not. But some will try. Jimmy Carter was way to soft to be in the office and that is being kind.
And to the neocons, What does getting a BJ have to do with doing a good job at work? I always had a better day at work after a good BJ.. Maybe you should get one and you would mellow out. Get laid dude.. and one chick.. I would never admit a fat chick blew me either..
Please put that on my permanent record..
Thank you..
2006-09-27 16:04:29 · answer #1 · answered by Don K 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I guess you are going to have to mark my permanent record...oh, gee...I am just shaking in my boots ;).
Jimmy Carter: Probably the best ex-president we have ever had. Did much more good out of the presidency than when he was in the presidential office. Worked with Habitat for Humanity, winner of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to work toward peace and democracy. As a president, especially in relation to domestic politics, however--a failure. 21% interest rates, no ability to bring people over to his point of view, alienated people in his own party...
Bill Clinton: Fifty years from now history may be kinder to him, and I think he was an o.k. president, but great....no. There was good reason he was considered by many folks to be the role model for the president in the movie "Wag the Dog"...Bill Clinton wasted his chance to become a great president when he said "I did not have sex with that woman" in reference to Monica Lewinsky, instead of admitting that yes, he was unfaithful to his wife up front...What his final legacy will be remains to be determined.
2006-09-27 16:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by blue nickel 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Worst: a million) Barack Obama (Marxist hatemonger - dividing u . s . a . swifter than any chief in history) 2) Jimmy Carter (in actuality a moron, yet additionally a socialist anti-Semite) 3) Woodrow Wilson (communist contemporary) 4) FDR (socialist and Stalin lover) Wimpiest: a million) Carter (no backbone in any respect) 2) Obama (thoroughly controlled via George Soros, yet additionally he's quite gay)
2016-10-18 02:47:22 · answer #3 · answered by balderas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go ahead and mark my permanent record. Who cares? Neither one was a good president, not to mention best ever. I actually voted for Jimmy Carter because like a lot of people I believed he was honest, and mistakenly assumed he would thus make a good president.
Not only did he mess up the military by trying to put women in combat. But, he also started the trend of not successfully doing anything about terrorist attacks against the US.
Anyone who thinks the lying, pandering, rapist president was any better needs a brain transplant. A conservative brain transplant.
2006-09-27 16:00:27 · answer #4 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Carter is an anti-freedom fool, he never met a murderous dictator that he didn't support. From Duvalier to Chavez, to Tito and Kim il Sung, to Ortega and Castro, to Giereck and Ceauscescu, heck, he even wrote a letter to the UN asking them to oppose the US efforts to kick Saddam out of Kuwait in 1991. Clinton is a bit of a liar, and a trailer trash sort of a man, but he isn't as bad as Carter. But I guess "It depends on what your definition of 'is', is."
2006-09-27 16:14:22 · answer #5 · answered by Zivien 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No and no. Clinton was one of the great ones, but not all-time best, a position I'd give to FDR or George Washington...Carter was well-meaning but ineffective (except on the Middle East), so I'd put him among the average presidents.
2006-09-27 15:56:44 · answer #6 · answered by Pandak 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I really liked both, especially Jimmy Carter because he was so moral without being paternalistic and patronizing about it. Bill Clinton wasn't all that moral, but he is very smart (you don't get to be a Rhodes Scholar for nothing).
2006-09-27 15:52:43 · answer #7 · answered by Shelley 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
MR CLINTON GOT MY VOTE AS THE BEST PRESIDENT SINCE THERE HAS BEEN A PRESIDENT IN THE USA. MR CARTER IS THE MOST HUMANE PRESIDENT WE HAVE EVER HAD.
2006-09-27 16:09:19 · answer #8 · answered by roy40372 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I can see you are a liberal, only those that agree with you have any truth to their views. Carter wanted to please everyone & instead angered everyone. Clinton was lucky to have .com com in on his watch. He did nothing to create, enable or foster it. The fondation of the Enron & Global Crossing happend also during his watch. Neither of the 2 did he have anything to do with. I'm sure you will give him credit for the good & hold him blameless for the bad. You are welcome to take off your glasses at any time.
2006-09-27 15:59:23 · answer #9 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Mr. Peanut, with his stagflation, double digit interest rates. The economy was in the tank, gas was rationed. Or the pants dropper in chief getting serviced in the Oval Office, invading the Balkans, Haiti, Somalia, bombing an aspirin factory and then when the going got tough he tucked tail and ran. Tough choice.
2006-09-27 15:54:13 · answer #10 · answered by Jeff F 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋