2006-09-27 15:45:01 · 5 answers · asked by djmantx 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
If that be true Sammy, Wouldn't we all be much safer locked up for our own protection..provideing we all had our seperate cells of course...????
2006-09-27 15:51:05 · update #1
Doesn't totalitarian governments have lower crime rates?
2006-09-27 15:52:59 · update #2
Lets gut the 4th Amendment! Thanks Bush, you criminal!
2006-09-27 15:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Try saying that ten times fast.
I doubt back then they had as much corruption in the government as we do today. But then, maybe I'm just misunderstanding this whole thing.
2006-09-27 15:53:04 · answer #2 · answered by almostdead 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It still should have been "Give me liberty or give me death." He had some big ones. Not like the politico-wuss suck ups that run the show these days.
2006-09-27 15:48:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
One of the main functions of Liberty is to keep you safe.
2006-09-27 15:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by Sammy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nah - he was never that constipated!
2006-09-27 15:47:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋