English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I DIDN'T VOTE FOR CLINTON, AND IT'S VERY OBVIOUS HE WAS A BETTER PRESIDENT. AND I KNOW IT!!

2006-09-27 15:41:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

TO SHUT UP DUMMY; ANYTIME CLINTON TOOK THE WAR TO AL QAIDA NEOCONS CRIED "WAG THE DOG!" OR "BOMBING ASPRIN FACTORIES" GET REAL!!

2006-09-27 15:46:53 · update #1

13 answers

I'm a liberal, but I still know that trolling up the forums doesn't accomplish anything.

Go watch tv, or perhaps read your Bible.

Peace and love be with ye.

2006-09-27 15:44:01 · answer #1 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 3 0

AGAIN, NEOCON IS THIS:



Neoconservatism is a political current and ideology, mainly in the United States, which is generally held to have emerged in the 1960s, coalesced in the 1970s, and has had a significant presence in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

The prefix neo- refers to two ways in which neoconservatism was new. First, many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism. Also, neoconservatism was a comparatively recent strain of conservative socio-political thought. It derived from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II, including literary criticism and the social sciences.

Irving Kristol,[1] Norman Podhoretz[2] and others described themselves as neoconservatives during the Cold War. Today, however, the movement's critics use the term more often than supporters. In fact, some people described as "neocons" today say that neoconservatism no longer exists as an identifiable movement.

Many associate neoconservatism with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard, along with the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Neoconservative journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and politicians, often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike, have been credited with (or blamed for) their influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.

Similarly, many other supposed neoconservatives believe that the term has been adopted by the political left to stereotype supporters of U.S. foreign policy under the George W. Bush administration. Others have similarly likened descriptions of neoconservatism to a conspiracy theory and attribute the term to anti-Semitism.

THIS IS THE REAL DEFINITION OF A "NEOCON".

YOUR IGNORANCE SHOWS YOUR FATE.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ak.Nh7s2zUIgdXpnAL2FEh_sy6IX?qid=20060927191540AAgAQVC

THIS HAS BEEN ANOTHER PRODUCT OF THE S3 PLAN

2006-09-27 15:46:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

so God will please as quickly as we withdraw understanding that 1000's human beings would be killed whilst Iraq government crumple like what we did in VN conflict? We, supporter of Pres. Bush, know what we could desire to do! we pick to combat now so as that our infants won't could desire to combat this conflict - we pick to enhance an best chum so as that it will no longer replace into an enemy - we don't stay right here, pray for God's protection from terrorism and don't something approximately it! If we in simple terms count on our fatherland protection, what's going to ensue if the terrorists fulfillment in easy terms a million of their plans? who's willingly to settle for the loss? remember, human beings makes the army win or lose their conflict, no longer the president (hist. has proved this certainty)

2016-12-12 16:28:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I really don't understand why people don't like President Bush. He is doing the best that he can. It is not his fault that 911 happened, nor that terrorism is on the rise. If you think you can do better, then write him a letter and give him your recommendations on how to handle the war on terrorism. I didn't vote for Clinton either.

2006-09-27 15:50:11 · answer #4 · answered by mandm 5 · 2 0

Actually President Bush answers the phone too... He isn't busy watching Eucanuba dog show for 2 1/2 hours and did not want to be disturbed, even though the head of the CIA is calling him to try to get his approval to capture UBM. I wonder why he gets so upset and defensive whenever he is questioned about this and other similar incidents. And let's not forget that he DID get on national TV and in front of a grand jury and LIE !!!!!

2006-09-27 16:17:09 · answer #5 · answered by jafnarf 3 · 0 1

He is not incompetant for protecting American citizens. And yes I did vote for him. Clinton had better things to do than take bin laden when he was offered up.

2006-09-27 15:52:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I dont fully support bush because he is not a true conservative. He is better than the horse faced democrat alternative.

2006-09-27 15:45:42 · answer #7 · answered by Keira 3 · 1 0

if clinton is better than bush than why didn't clinton fight back after they attacked us in 1993 at the wtc and our embassy's and the USS Cole clinton didn't do **** bush has the balls to fight back

2006-09-27 15:50:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

your the only one thats knows it, bush took the war to the terrorist, your poster boy would have cried like a school girl....


LMAO, and he taught ugly fat interns too..... I served in the military while he was in office, and for that i was proud, you generalize too much...

2006-09-27 15:45:23 · answer #9 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2 1

I_am_not_a_neocon! I'm a uniter.

2006-09-27 15:44:32 · answer #10 · answered by Baby Shiraz 1 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers