first off,,,,,911 happened on bushs watch, so AFTER 911 we are going to keep track of how many die?..ignore the 3000, NOW we're really trying.
why should the terrorists risk their time and effort attacking US soil when they can take out US soldiers everyday?..bush has provided americans for them to kill on a daily basis w/o leaving the region.
2006-09-27 15:30:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. The biggest was the stolen election of 2000.
2006-09-27 15:32:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
nicely, only because there have been no glaring attacks would not advise there have been not any. would you call the Salmonella outbreak as a results of tainted nutrients only undesirable hygiene or ought to it were a terrorist attack? What about those type of id thefts -- at the same time as your id is stolen, it really is a terrorist attack on your man or woman. How do all of us keep in mind that those practice wrecks or bus wrecks or nutrients contaminations are not terrorist attacks -- only because the authorities says they are no longer? at the same time as suicide bombers kill 5 or six human beings in Iraq, they are terrorists. nicely, how do all of us understand those bus wrecks and 5 motor vehicle crashes are not led to through terrorists? only 2 weeks in the past the citadel Dix Six were arrested and it changed into admitted that terrorist cells are operating everywhere in the u . s . a .. We stuck 6 of what's declared to be over 813,000 suspected terrorists residing contained in the u . s . a .. at the same time as monetary company robbers flow a again guns blazing, i do not call that an worry-free robbery. To me it really is a terrorist attack and the money they get away with is incidental. So, i wager no matter if you've faith there have been no attacks on U.S. soil for the reason that 9/11/01 relies upon mostly on the way you in my view outline terrorism. there is an previous declaring "It takes 20,000 bolts to construct a motor vehicle and one nut to spoil it." that would not advise it takes explosives or perhaps what we examine out as terrorist guns. It only signifies that one nut removed from a strategic position can camoflage a terrorist attack as an worry-free malfunction or undesirable upkeep. at the same time as a gentle Mexican guy ejaculates right into a bottle of salad dressing and then places it again on the table at a college, it really isn't any longer a prank, it really is terrorism.
2016-11-24 23:40:01 · answer #2 · answered by brigance 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Second biggest. George w Bush is the biggest load of crap ever served by the GOP
2006-09-27 16:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
... and the 2004 election as well was STOLEN! *ahem* and YES it is a big load of what i'm sure bush's breath smells like. but anywho - until americans stop and realize WHY 9/11 happened and WHO made it happen, there is not a THING that can be done about it. mike moore tried, but take one look at that guy - who is going to take him seriously even though his 9/11 movie made me want to hunt bush down and slap him in the face!!
2006-09-27 15:36:22 · answer #4 · answered by Jennifer B 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I guess that whole anthrax thing was just a bad dream then. Oh and those two fools running around shooting people in VA an MD sure seemed like terrorist to me.
I suppose if we can't blame it on "Islamofacist" it really did not happen.
2006-09-27 15:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Right on! We are breeding terrorists! Bush, nor anyone else will stop it by using violence!
Leo would rather get innocent people killed as long as they aren't here! What's the matter, you willing to let others give their lives, but you aren't wiling to give your life for freedom?
2006-09-27 15:34:14 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It should be "more attacks on US citizens off soil."
2006-09-27 15:37:41 · answer #7 · answered by Got pretzels? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How can it be crap when it is true. Remember 9/11 was planned during the clinton admn. and slick willie passed on bin for bigger and better things like monica.
2006-09-27 15:36:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
YES IT IS! THEY CONVENIENTLY FORGET THE 8 YEARS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY UNDER THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION!!
I DIDN'T LIKE EVERYTHING CLINTON DID. BUT OVERALL HE DID AN OUTSTANDING JOB. I DIDN'T EVEN VOTE FOR HIM!!
2006-09-27 15:37:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Man, im glad whoever you voted for never got into office.
I think you should just check this out: http://vpoet.net/flash/youare.swf
2006-09-27 15:32:43 · answer #10 · answered by Sammy 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋