2006-09-27 15:19:07 · 20 answers · asked by shut up dummy 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes, a safe and secure America is the fault of Bush!
how dare he protect the people!!!!!
2006-09-27 15:22:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Tell me Bush is Hitler what 5 years where those ?
93 WTC the 1st time
95 Kohbar towers
98 Twin Embassy attacks
00 USS COLE
2006-09-27 15:56:12 · answer #2 · answered by Fatwa Freddie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush and his Administration are equally responsible for the lack of terrorist activity on N. American soil as they are responsible for the complete and utter absense of flying pink elephants circling dense population centers and dropping gold nuggets out of their arses.
Though, if that did happen, Shrub would find a way to take the credit, and then add that terrorists were threatening to attack them unless we took away some more or the US citizens rights and that it was OK to torture them should any be caught.
2006-09-27 15:23:20 · answer #3 · answered by arcane_comp 1 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, but we can blame him for the terror attacks on our American wallets.
2006-09-27 15:30:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
DId you forget about 9/11??
2006-09-27 15:30:38 · answer #5 · answered by msvicki0123 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
How about blaming the source..Ben Ladin...& Slick Willie (Clinton)for sitting on his azz & passin' the buck....I would of rather dealt with terrorists back in the Clinton days than watching my fellow Americans die due to it..Bush is simply mopping up after Clinton..Just as Hillary has done for him for years now..Bush is doing well for all he has to endure..
2006-09-27 15:29:11 · answer #6 · answered by *toona* 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
well since he is blamed for everything bad it is damn time to say what he has done good. And you named one of the many things that has gone right for America
2006-09-27 15:27:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
FACT: NO TERROR ATTACK ON U.S. SOIL SINCE THE LAST TIME BUSHCO STAGED ONE FOR ISRAEL.
LOOK IT UP.
2006-09-27 15:29:21 · answer #8 · answered by mikeygonebad 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yup. If it's all good, thank us--if it's bad, blame Clinton, heh heh.
2006-09-27 15:24:55 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, but we can blame him for the ones to come since he has single handedly energized the jihadist movement.
2006-09-27 15:21:52 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Maybe they're waiting for him to read another kiddie book, so he can sit around and do nothing when we are attacked.
2006-09-27 15:22:55 · answer #11 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋