2006-09-27 14:06:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES, I REMEMBER DISINCTLY, EVERYTHING WITH THEM WAS "WAG THE DOG" OR "BOMBING ASPIRIN FACTORIES". THEY HATED HIM FIGHTING TERROR!!
2006-09-27 14:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Republicans have HATED Clinton since he entered the public ring. Maybe they saw a man who really cares for the American people and the country. A man who is so much more intelligent and thoughtful than most of the Republicans. Personally, the Repb. are scared to death of Mr. Clinton. If he could run again, it would be a land slide victory.
2006-09-27 21:14:22 · answer #2 · answered by firewomen 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Both parties are at fault in the battle of bickering.Its sad that sooo much time is spent on attacking each other instead of really working to solve the problems in this country.From what I understand Clinton said he gave orders to kill bin laden but people in his adminastration are on record as to the claim that he did not answer 4 calls from the field when our forces had him targeted and needed an o.k. from Clinton to kill him.Kind of contridictory.He is also on audio talking about the Sudanies offer to hand binladen over to us and Clinton thought it was to much of a political hot potato to accept the offer.ever though he knew binladen wanted to do us harm.
2006-09-27 21:14:58 · answer #3 · answered by scott k 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton did not attack terrorism. Infact, he dumbed down and slashed our intelligence capabilities. The Republicans did not make him do that.
Clinton only has himself to blame for the Lewinksi scandal "getting in the way" of his handling of national security. It's called personal accountability. He had oral sex in the oval office. If any regular joe working at Burger King would have been caught having sex at work they would IMMEDIATELY be fired. In fact if any Republican president would have done what Clinton did, the feminists groups would have made sure that he was thrown out of office immediately. Bill Clinton actually got special treatment and got off (no pun intended) easy.
It was BILL CLINTON'S fault that the Lewinksy scandal supposedly "got in the way" of his handling of national security. NOT anyone elses.
2006-09-27 21:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by chuck3011 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They have different philosophy of government, so now Republicans say the same thing about democrats opposing war in Iraq, war tribunals, secret surveilance, terror detainee rights...etc.
2006-09-27 21:13:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They also refused to hold hearings on most of his judicial nominations and then squealed like the pigs they are when the Democrats threatened a filibuster of Bush The Lesser's extremist nominees.
2006-09-27 21:11:11 · answer #6 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Cite examples. Clinton claimed the same but didn't mention specifics when he lost his mind the other day. (Good thing a guy that unstable isn't in a position to launch nukes anymore.)
2006-09-27 21:11:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Clinton's only "obstruction" was a cigar "obstructing" an intern's vagina!
2006-09-27 21:09:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because they were much more concerned about impeaching him for lying about getting blowjobs from an intern. That's where their priorities were.
2006-09-27 21:09:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They hate him; they wanted him to fail at everything. Even protecting the country!
2006-09-27 21:08:08 · answer #10 · answered by Phil S 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋