"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
2006-09-27 13:55:47 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay ... and if Bush is so damn good at catching terrorist why hasn't he caught him? If he is not a priority now, after 9/11, how could he be a priority 10 years ago? What is the priority, creating an environment where there are more radicals engaged in terrorism now then there was in 2001? The Neocons want it both ways. They want to condemn Clinton for not catching him. They want to make idiotic excuses for Bush not catching him. They just want to kill, and kill, and kill some more. Bush's supporters are caught up in some kind of blood thirsty feeding frenzy, and nothing is going to stop them until there are allot MORE dead bodies on the street of the USA so they can kill some more.
2006-09-27 14:12:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think both Bush and Clinton were bad at catching Bin Laden. Proof? He's still at large.
2006-09-27 13:59:29 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Obama would not capture Bin encumbered you understand they are not going to own up and say Obama fail they are going to shop blaming Bush. own duty is temporarily grant in the Democrat camp as data via the enormous quantity of human beings averting the question or going lower back to Bush. After 4 years we are able to be certain what Obama does approximately Bin encumbered.
2016-10-18 02:38:39 · answer #3 · answered by shine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bin Laden isn't the priority.
2006-09-27 13:56:56 · answer #4 · answered by fun_guy_otown 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Bush's team who rule the USA has created Bin Laden and Use it as a doll to frightening the world .
they are Bin Laden's parteners in all terror actions around the world.
2006-09-27 13:58:37 · answer #5 · answered by dr_rabiefahoom 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why should it be top priority? If we kill him, another will replace him. So, we spend millions hunting down the head of the snake?
Besides, I think our GOV is not trying to hard for a reason. What reason? I have no clue, but it's really weird that we have been "hunting" for OBL and not even come close! :(
2006-09-27 14:00:54 · answer #6 · answered by Life after 45 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush can't even catch a cold!
2006-09-27 14:06:07 · answer #7 · answered by kman1830 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can Slick Willie be bad at something he could not do in 7 years??
2006-09-27 14:11:24 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"lF CLINTON WAS SO BAD AT CATCHING BIN LADEN WHY DID BUSH SAY THIS?"
If clinton was NOT so bad at catching Bin Laden then why dident he catch him????
2006-09-27 13:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by Joshua V 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Bush is a criminal and a liar, who cares what he thinks or says?
2006-09-27 13:57:03 · answer #10 · answered by imalickyouallover69 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋