YOU REMEMBER THE LAST TIME HE DID THAT HE WAS SELLING HIS BOGUS WAR TO CONGRESS.
2006-09-27 13:51:59 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You can guarantee that he is only going to let people see what is not to damaging to him. That's human nature, but I wonder how on earth that congress lets him get away with that. Oh I forgot they are a repuke majority and lack the nads to get it done.
2006-09-27 13:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ridiculous question. The document is classified to protect the intelligence operatives. He released the entire set of conclusions, because cherry picked tidbits were printed by the press as they were leaked by someone in violation of their oath of secrecy regarding intelligence information. If you weren't upset when the NYT released a few sentences of the conclusions, how can you be upset with Bush for releasing the entire four pages? It's not like it was a glowing report. It was pretty much down the middle. Is that why partisan people are upset?
2006-09-27 13:56:06 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes he is. Doesn't really matter if he only releases those three pages, the damage is done. We now know he might as well have opened a recruitment office in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Londonistan.
We need to be afraid.. very afraid.
Wait.... Isn't that what they wanted all along?
2006-09-27 13:57:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They released the important points that the democrats were spinning. To release anything else would comprimise all that we are doing. I just think its funny that throughout all the leaks to the democrats aka. New York Times, they havent gone crazy about declassifying everything. This is just a campaign just like the George Allen accusations, nothing but a smear job.
2006-09-27 13:56:20 · answer #4 · answered by Wyatt 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Of course he is the Cherry Picking Daddy!!PEACE IN THE MIDDLE-EAST and VOTE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON IN 2008!!
2006-09-27 13:58:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
so it was ok for the libs to cherry pick what got leaked?
leakers should go to prison, but what would happen to the democrat party behind bars? any more thousand dollar bills in the freezer? or dead girl freinds in the bottom of lake chappaquidick?
2006-09-27 13:56:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Of course.
The cons will say it's because of "security purposes"
Meaning they're worried about the security of their re-election...
2006-09-27 13:54:21 · answer #7 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course.
2006-09-27 14:06:36 · answer #8 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably
2006-09-27 13:54:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
bush is calling for the release of the whole report, its the dems that dont want that,they only wanted what was released, the first three pages.....LMAO
2006-09-27 13:55:48 · answer #10 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋