English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Conspiracy theorists have been claiming that 9/11 was a plot!

I don't care for the administration.....but why in the world why anyone think that 9/11 was a plot?

There would have to be thousands of people involved in the "plot"...why haven't any of them came forward? The plot idea is rediculous. Mistakes were made...but no plot.

2006-09-27 12:34:20 · 28 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

correct I don't care for Bush....but claiming he was involved in a plot is rediculous.

2006-09-27 12:39:00 · update #1

The "plot" theory is nuts.

2006-09-27 12:41:09 · update #2

28 answers

fully agree, i like the way you worded your question, you dont care for the admin, yet your not calling him the devil and such...... 9-11 was a terror plot that was successful, since the war on terror has not been on our soil...

2006-09-27 12:37:43 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 5 3

The events of 9/11 did happen, and nobody is claiming the didn't.
The actual real events of 9/11 were that three towers in the World trade centre collapsed, killing 3000 people, and a hole was blown in the side of the Pentagon.
The only question is, how did that happen.

There's the government theory, as follows
The biggest conspiracy theory


The biggest conspiracy theory is that 19 Arabs, who had been under surveillance, conspired together, walked onto four commercial aircraft without being detected, and without having their names appear on a passenger list. Then that they overcame over 250 people with plastic box-cutters. And not only that, but with no previous experience of flying large jets, they navigated from 30,000 feet and hit three out of four targets precisely, meantime conducting flying manoeuvres that fighter pilots would find difficult. Then, the amazing thing is that 7 of them survived the events and are known to be alive today.
Also for the first time ever in history, three, not two, but three steel framed buildings collapsed as a result of fire which could not possibly have burned hot enough to melt steel, and caused the buildings not to topple over, as one might expect, or to fall a little at a time, but to fall within their own footprint at the speed of gravity. And one of those buildings (WTC7) was not even hit by a plane.
Not only that, but the four aircraft disappeared completely without a trace of their 16 large engines, or any of the black boxes. This has also never before happened in history.


This theory is so amazingly full of holes that it is impossible for any sane thinking person to believe, yet that is what the official 9/11 commission report.says.

There are also various alternative theories, many of which are far more realistic and believable than the one above.

Personally, I believe the nearest to the truth I have come can be found at
Detailed 9/11 research work
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/research.html

Read and learn!

2006-09-27 20:44:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Have you ever seen V for Vendetta, its a sweet movie and along the lines of these theorys, if anyone came forward about being involved in the plot can you imagine what would happen to them even before the feds got to them, i know even if i was a cop i would tie them up take them to the center of town tell everyone what they did, cut all their fingers off and crush their toes with a hammer one by one just for being dumb enough to tell me first and let the rest of the people have their turn. There are plenty of reasons to think it was a plot, my biggest is that the wtc was attacked when the first bush was in office and then again when the second one was in office and after that the retard tried to open up our ports to them WTF is that about?? you tell me, no really you email me and tell me, also they say that the buildings fell cause of the fire not the planes themselves right, why are they the first buildings of that standard to fall from fire, jet fuel NO they expect fires when a plane crashes and those buildings were built with a plane possibly flying into them in mind, other buildings have burnt to the point that it was basically a frame left, oh wait it was the added weight of the planes right??? Im sure the all the cranes and equipment that was on the building when it was being built weighed more that one of those planes did

2006-09-27 19:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by puresplprix 4 · 0 0

Actually "hmm?", and this is not only for you. Steel doesn't melt until somewhere above 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, but it begins to "draw" at about 500 degrees and reaches red heat at about 1000 or so. These figures are very rough, but my point is that the steel in the towers absolutely did soften and fail far below the melting point of steel, and at a point very easily reached by burning jet fuel. You are far too young to recall the fire that destroyed the GM Hydramatic transmission plant at Livonia, Michigan, but it started in a puddle of transmission oil. Before it was over the structural steel roof beams had buckled and drooped to the floor.

2006-09-27 19:53:43 · answer #4 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 1 0

Can you PLEES tell me on the Pentagon building why is there no plain parts IE wings engine EC sec i am sick of people saying you read to much mike more books or aha you have been Reading conspiracy theory's in the net when i say 911 was set up by bush all i say is lets have it out in court why has it not happened yet?

2006-09-27 22:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

you are saying that the theories are ridiculous.. proves that you have never checked in to it for yourself.. My feeling for Bush has nothing to do with 9/11 the reality is .. that it did happen and it is impossible for it to have occurred the way they say it did... if for no other reason that no jets were scrambled to intercept the second plane ????? how can you be that blind ? when the second plane began it's journey 20 minutes behind the first one.. everyone knowing that the first plane had crashed into the tower would have realized that the second plane was the exact same trajectory... hence the 5 airfields that the planes flew over would have been mobilized ?????? check the publicly available FAA guide rules for "Aircraft in Distress" ... this is common FAA policy///... period .. there is no denying the fact that no planes were scrambled.. someone gave an order to stand down !

2006-09-27 20:04:22 · answer #6 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 1 1

Some people, on the far left, never met a conservative in a tin foil hat, our far right put on fatigues and target practice with AK 47's, hay maybe we should get these two groups together, that would be interesting. They could explain the conspiracy plot behind them getting their tin foil hat blown off.

2006-09-27 19:43:39 · answer #7 · answered by razeumright 3 · 0 1

Because lots of people are determined to believe in conspiracy's. The loose change guys are idiots, the real nut jobs are the ones who believe in The Illuminati and new world order plots.

2006-09-27 19:37:51 · answer #8 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 2 2

Its like when 9/11 happened, the whole country cried out for revenge and now they are crying and whining about bush. go figure.

2006-09-27 19:38:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Life is fun. Enjoy it. Here's what's funny.....
Democrats created the conspiracy theory that 9/11 never happened.
They hoped that most Americans would believe that 9/11 was an elaborate illusion.
BUT, what happened was that little gullible and ignorant Democrats were all that believed.
Everyone else just laughs at the fools.

2006-09-27 19:42:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Because people are idiots and a lot of them don't trust the government, which isn't entirely unjustified.
But our government has not demonstrated the competance required to perform anything on the scale of 911.

2006-09-27 19:42:31 · answer #11 · answered by Dane 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers