I just need to kno.
2006-09-27 12:02:03 · 14 answers · asked by Bou 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
ok thanx very much.
2006-09-27 13:06:44 · update #1
Not automatically, no.
n England, It's up to the Monarch to decide what titles they would have, if any.
In the case of Princess Anne's kids, they could have been named as prince and princess, but Princess Anne chose not to accept the honour, because she wanted them to lead a more "normal" life.
The Queen of England can make anyone a Prince/Princess, and can also revoke the title, regardless of whether they are related to her. The children of Princes/princesses however, cannot use the same title just because of their parents.
2006-09-27 20:15:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Titles only pass through the male line. This is due to the Order in Council laid down by King George V in 1917 which defined the structure of the Royal Family in terms of who would carry the right to be a 'Royal Highness'. As part of the Order, it was stipulated that the children of the sovereign and grandchildren of the sovereign through the male line would carry the style 'HRH'.
In the case of Princess Anne, daughter of the Queen, her children do not have titles such as Prince/Princess because they are grandchildren through the female line. The children of the Queen's sons hold titles, in the case of Prince Charles and Prince Andrew, their children hold the titles Prince/Princess because they, as grandchildren of the sovereign in the male line, are entitled to them. The Queen's youngest son has a daughter, Lady Louise Windsor, and she is also entitled to use the title of Princess, however prior to her birth her parents decided their children should not be burdened by royal titles. So, just because someone is a Prince/Princess, doesn't mean that their children are also similarly titled.
It should be noted that titles such as Prince/Princess are only allowed for the children and grandchildren (through the male line) of the sovereign. With the exception of the children of Prince William and Prince Harry, the great-grandchildren of the Queen would not hold titles, even if they are in the male line. An example of this would be the grandchildren of King George V, his son Prince Henry had two sons, Prince William and Prince Richard. Although a male line grandchild, Prince Richard's children, do not hold the title of Prince/Princess.
2006-09-28 08:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by Marilyn 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well yes but not in all cases because Princess Carolina of Monacco has a daughter and a son and they're not princess nor prince.
2006-09-27 19:10:24 · answer #3 · answered by Alicia V 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For example: The children of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer are Prince William and Prince Harry.
2006-09-27 19:04:15 · answer #4 · answered by goodbye 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Princess Anne’s children Peter and Zara (sp) don’t have the title of Prince and Princess. So that says in some cases if your born a Princess that your children wouldn’t get the title unless you yourself take the thrown. Though I guess it may vary depending on the monarch
2006-09-28 01:02:03 · answer #5 · answered by Spread Peace and Love 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are called prince or princess in waiting.
2006-09-27 19:04:17 · answer #6 · answered by ☺collia☺ PaRtY LiKe tInKeRbElL 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
In England, they've got their "Prince Charles", who's the son of the Queen..and his two sons are also known by the "Prince" title... William, the one who looks like a girl, and Harry the Nazi... so I guess the answer to your question is indeed "yes".
2006-09-27 19:06:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
They are scroungers and parasites - who cares what else they might be called.
2006-09-28 21:30:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
usually yes but depends on the country
2006-09-27 22:35:13 · answer #9 · answered by SEE 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
2006-09-27 19:03:14 · answer #10 · answered by ms.melancholy 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋