Very interesting last night to see Bush spouting that the National Security Agency report from last spring had been misunderstood and taken out of context.
Ten minutes later BBC in Washington display a copy of the report and read from it verbatim.
Guess it all depends on what your definition of "is" is...
You'd think with $30million being spent on Whitehouse speech writers every year, at least one of them could have read it to George, maybe showed him the pictures?
2006-09-27 12:00:42 · 3 answers · asked by Gaspode 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Different people have different opinions as to why Bush acts in this manner. Sometimes it seems to me, he is so arrogant he believes he can tell the American people anything and they will believe it.
2006-09-27 12:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by beez 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess it depends on who is listening to - a died in the wool liberal who hates Bush or someone who supports President Bush. I have read not just listened & every news person seems to read & hear a different thing. Everything said or written is not always taken the way it is meant.
"Is" means it did not matter what President Bush said, you were going to be critical of it. Why "is" he wasting time trying to please you?
2006-09-27 19:09:36 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
30 million isn't enough. We need a new tax to fund speech writers.
2006-09-27 19:03:05 · answer #3 · answered by Yit 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋