English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

they shouldve known not to mess with a pro....now they are busy with damage control......hahaahah

2006-09-27 11:20:46 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

let see Pres. Clinton lying on tv , like that has never happened before. his bombing helped cause Bin Landen to grow in strength. because when the most powerful nation lops a couple bombs at you and miss this makes you more powerful. 60 minutes did a good piece on this how Bin Landen grew in power due to this. he became a hero. so glad you applaud the pres. inaction.

2006-09-27 12:45:27 · answer #1 · answered by rap1361 6 · 1 0

Who Cares What A Lying Cheating Thieving Clinton Has To Say To Start With ? Jus A Handful Of Democrat Idiots That Dream Of Ever Having a Candidate Worth Putting On The Ballot,So Far Its Been Medication U Guys Keep Ranting CRAZY Stuff On Here It May Be The Cuckoos Nest For U.Now Be Good Old Folks And Take Yer Nap...

2006-09-27 18:28:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

last i checked on the interview it looked like clinton was about to burst into tears hes got alot of damage control himself.




THE CLINTON INTERVIEW

Well, you gotta admit .. that was a pretty intense Chris Wallace interview of Bill Clinton last night [video] on Fox News Sunday. Bill Clinton obviously doesn't particularly like being criticized for his failure to pursue Osama bin Laden.

The interview, the first Clinton has ever given to the Fox News Channel, started out innocently enough...with Wallace asking the smiling Clinton about his initiatives to save lives around the world and so forth.

So then Wallace asks a question that viewers had e-mailed in. Why didn't Clinton do more to connect the dots and put Al-Qaeda out of business. This is where Clinton erupted --- immediately going on the defensive. He says he did more to kill Osama Bin Laden than the Bush Administration did in the first 8 months it was in office. He's upset that the Bush Administration is never criticized for that. Of course, the Bush Administration had 8 months....the Clinton Administration had 8 years.

In his response to Wallace's question Clinton relied strongly on the statements of Richard Clark, Clinton's chief anti-terrorist operative during his presidency. But after the interview Fox News did some more research into Richard Clark and found that his assessment of Clinton's efforts was not all that positive.

In a 2004 CNN interview Richard Clark spoke of one particular Clinton attempt to "get" Osama bin Laden. "Clinton bombed them once; the public reaction was negative to that. Remember 'wag the dog?' Everyone said Clinton is just bombing Afghanistan to divert attention from the Monica business. And so he didn't bomb them again."

Well .. that doesn't make it look as if Clinton was quite as dedicated to the idea of killing Osama bin Laden as he would have had us believe, does it?

Fox News also restated one of the findings of the 9/11 Commission report says where it was stated that in December of 1999 Richard Clark sent Clinton a memo urging an attack on Al Qaeda basis before the millennium. Sandy Berger wrote on the memo "No." Wow -- that sure does show a dedication to get bin Laden, doesn't it?

My feeling is that this whole "lose your temper" bit is going to backfire on Clinton. His "I tried" stuff is going to cause people to look at his record anew. That's probably not something he will welcome.

JUST WHAT IS THE POINT HERE?

2006-09-28 13:34:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, it looks bad on Clinton. He is normally composed, but he stooped low this time. There was no reason for what he did. Tougher questioning has been given to Bush and Cheney and they did not have this kind of meltdown. This will go down in history in the same catagory as Howard Dean's sqwaking episode when he was on the campaign trail. The Republicans owe Clinton a thank-you for this one.

2006-09-27 18:32:42 · answer #4 · answered by chuck3011 3 · 2 0

hey okidoki

your opinion means little, take a look at how the GOP is busy issuing responses and trying to undo the damage clinton did to the liars on the right.......how does it feel to have an idiot expose the GOP for the scum they are this close to the election?

2006-09-27 18:25:55 · answer #5 · answered by bush-deathgrip 1 · 0 2

we are still mad at that the mean man on FOX made our hero cry like a baby We monkey libs thought Mr.Bill was a better man than that, but with him crying and lying, we monkey libs are deeply saddened

2006-09-27 18:32:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I actually thought he looked like an idiot.

2006-09-27 18:23:03 · answer #7 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 2 0

looks like Fox caught iits tongue!!!!

that f**en wallace!!! tried to interrupt!!! but didn't work!!!

FOX is piece of crap!!! so Is Glen Beck!!!!

2006-09-27 18:21:58 · answer #8 · answered by David F 2 · 0 1

mmmmm I like golden showers :-)

2006-09-27 18:56:12 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers