It should be something that sounds reasonable, maybe pertaining to current affairs in the U.S.
2006-09-27 10:35:40 · 12 answers · asked by alk3punkgurl 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Three specific sets of changes. One to fix equal protection, one to clear up electoral problems, and one to address legal interpretation issues and limit federal lawmaking back to constitutional intent.
Full text of all three amendments linked below.
2006-09-27 10:43:57 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
particular. we could examine the 1st substitute. "Congress shall make no regulation respecting a company of religion, or prohibiting the unfastened exercising thereof; or abridging the liberty of speech, or of the clicking; or of the individuals peaceably to convey mutually, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Now, the question is, in case you have college prayer are you organising a State faith? and in case you limit college prayer are you prohibiting the unfastened exercising thereof? So the Muslin little ones get footbaths, the Sieks get to hold knives, however the Christians won't be able to pray. or perhaps have the alternative of praying. considering that we are "going there" Why is it okay to do a "flag salute" yet no longer pray? What while you're offend by ability of the pledge of allegiance? Why must you youngster could sit down and hear it customary, whether he does not could participate? no count if that is sturdy sufficient for the flag salute, why no longer a prayer? as quickly as back, life is a good distance from elementary. What even makes one individual happy, will tick off something else.
2016-10-18 02:21:36 · answer #2 · answered by casaliggi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would get an ammendment passed that said
1. Only a person who is born inside the United States whose parent is a citizen of the United States shall be a citizen of the United States all other persons shall go through a naturalization process as prescribed by congress to become citizens.
2. The right to vote in the United States shall be limited to those citizens of the United States who own land inside the United States and who pay a net tax burden in the year preceeding the election in which they wish to vote
2006-09-27 10:43:09 · answer #3 · answered by Joel D 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
An amendment defining life as beginning at the moment of conception and ending at the time of natural death.
2006-09-27 10:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
To ban smoking and all tobacco products.
So no one would ever have to suffer through COPD like I have.
Doing so would tremendously reduce call off's from work places, reduce colds, bronchitis, and other heart and lung disease. Thus reducing our health care costs by billions each year.
2006-09-27 10:40:50 · answer #5 · answered by Frogface53 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Revamp the electoral system to make presidential canidates speak to all states and not just the states with the most electorates.
2006-09-27 10:44:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
To force ignorant dips to learn that burning a flag is one of the only legal, and suggested, method for disposing of US flags. As said by the US Government.
2006-09-27 10:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
That anyone who works in the Pentagon or State Department goes to jail for TREASON for leaking secrets to Congressmen or the New York Times (where their motto is, "All the Printed News that kills Americans!")
For obvious reasons....
2006-09-27 10:40:40 · answer #8 · answered by Number1son 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No burning of the U.S. flag.
I think it is not a freedom of speech issue. They do it to be disrespectful.
2006-09-27 10:38:13 · answer #9 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
To ban sex outside of marriage.
2006-09-27 10:39:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋