Do you think that illegal immigrants should be denied social services health care etc??

Question

As put forh by California's Proposition 187 illegal immigrants should be denied social services, health care and education in order to dissuade illegal immirants from entering the US in the future.

What is your opinion? Should they be denied?

Answer 1

I think the answer lies in their title ILLEGAL immigrants.

Answer 2

Yes, I do believe they should be denied, to a certain extent. No one should be left dying anywhere, obviously, but people EXPECT rights and to be treated equally when they come into this country and I cannot understand how someone can demend respect from a country and it's citizens when they enter under illegal pretenses.

I used to work for an ambulance company and would see dozens of calls dispatched every day in southern California down to San Ysidro at the border crossing. So many illegals were becoming injured trying to jump the fence. Thousands and thousands of dollars in ambulance trips have to be written off because they have no form of health insurance (obviously), no forms of identification to help in finding them and 99% of the time, do not give an address in Mexico to be reached at. I've even seen helicopter rescues that are dispatched that end up being written off because they have no way of paying. This is why it costs $500.00 right off the bat for american citizens to be taken to the hospital when they have an actual emergency. It's unfair, and it should be stopped. Unfortunately, I think it is difficult to draw the line when it comes to a human life and it's value, withstanding the fact that someone may be illegal or not.

Answer 3

I propose that the better cut back for contributions be executed away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "provide away" software yet one that all of us make contributions to love a cost reductions plan, and can be shielded from different makes use of with the help of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so frightened approximately it then why do not you; first positioned it back into the own sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for their very own interest, 2d pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet by no skill paid a penny to it, and finally have it an identical for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they like something greater they do it on their very own devoid of the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had by no skill been extremely replaced. They, a team of scholars, pronounced that one and all costs of interest may well be 3% or much less for each individual to grow to be rich if needed (that is genuine additionally to taces). the main suitable financial concern may well be, they reported, whilst there have been no costs of interest. Why not attempt this answer? the rich might nonetheless be rich. My question is: whilst soial protection turns right into a topic related to federal expenses, why not artwork with a balanced or income funds and spend no greater suitable than is obtainable in, as any relatives has to try for? Why not ban all loobying presents with the intention to get regulations that serve the rustic? God bless u . s ..

Answer 4

I believe the answer is not so simple.
It is true that one could question the rationality of paying for tuition for children who are not even supposed to be in the country. On the other hand:
1. One could question the rationality of laws preventing these immigrants from entering legally
2. Often the authorities wink at the presence of illegal immigrants because they are being exploited for cheap labour. In this case, it is contradictory not to 'wink' at the child's presence in school, etc.
3. Should the children be punished for the illegality of the parents?
So I think that as long as they are in the country the country needs to take care of them. For the children to be identified as children of illegal immigrants proves that those 'illegals' are known by the authorities to be in the country, and their whereabouts are known. So the very illegality of their presence could be brought into question. The US waisted no time in sending Arar, a Canadian citizen, to be tortured in Siria. They could be as quick about expelling the illegals as well, if they really didn't want them to be there.

Answer 5

I think that Illegal immigrants should be denied all rights period. If people who were in the country illegally had no rights and no legal recourse for any action taken against them they would all leave. If we need the labor pool then we should increase legal immigration so that we can be somewhat selective in the people who come here and not get crooks and people just looking to suck off the system.

Answer 6

If they pay taxes (unlikely) then no. Otherwise, yes. However, hospitals probably won't turn away patients due to the code of ethics. I don't think immigrants come here solely for the reasons listed. I think they come for a better life,--the above included in that-- but they should do it legally.

Answer 7

YES YES but the opposite is happening, people are going out of their way to help them meanwhile turning their back on legal citizen's how can this be? I am afraid to mention what state i am in where this is happening don't want to clue more this way! Got to go after the Employers even before the phony fence deal!

Answer 8

It is my opinion they should be denied of social services, welfare and free medical care. I think that when/if they do become legal that they have to prove theycan afford to live here and show a plan of how they plan to support themselves. Their plan to have medical and car insurance and then have our government see to it that the immigrants follow through!

i have heard that the immigrants are taking over and they are doing it by fu**ing their way to the top, reproduction is a powerful thing.

Answer 9

Yes, why should legal tax payers have to foot there bill. And for those who say they pay taxes well the average kid costs over $5000 dollars to send to school for a year don't tell me people being payed minimum wage are paying $5000 a year in taxes.

Answer 10

Yes! They broke our laws and now want to take advantage of each and every taxpayer. No other country has been so stupid in allowing this for so long. What other country on the face of the earth would be so foolish and unfair to their own citizens.

Answer 11

California isn't the only State putting it to the people. Arizona will pass a similar law.