Were his works insightful, hateful, evil, etc. ?
2006-09-27 08:26:21 · 9 answers · asked by Jim 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It was a start.
2006-09-27 08:28:21 · answer #1 · answered by lunatic 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He change into an fairly disturbed man or woman. My philosophy in lifeis something is going so long because it really is consensual. it really is my understand-how that a number of his exploits were no longer consensual with the different party. it really is even as it is going to change into an concern with me. in the different case, my ability to him. once you try to communicate about the atheistic area of him to by some potential discredit atheism, i'd say take a seem at John Wayne Gacy. He change right into a Christian who tortured youthful boys in a lot a similar concepts de Sade did. He also examine his sufferers scripture in between beating/maiming/sodomizing/killing them. There are crazies less than all banners.
2016-10-16 02:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Worthless. A waste of time reading. Of some minor historical interest, but no practical value to anyone.
2006-09-27 09:26:13 · answer #3 · answered by yahoohoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very hateful towards women, but overall rather overwrought and not that well written (perhaps I got ahold of a faulty translation)
2006-09-27 08:28:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't remember ever reading his writings, but I suppose they are more interesting then Penis and Hitlery Clinton's autobiographies, which appear in different shops with indications that they cost a lot of money (and amazingly, not only in Israel).
2006-09-27 08:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
So badly written as to be almost unreadable.
2006-09-27 08:31:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Painful to read.
2006-09-27 08:34:36 · answer #7 · answered by doggiebike 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Kind of funny.
2006-09-27 10:01:07 · answer #8 · answered by nelabis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They were irrelevant.
2006-09-27 08:28:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋