don't be lazy! and if you not then listen so you can learn
solve for R, we want this to be by itself
make sure the problem reads like: W =(2PR)/R - r and not W=(2PR)/(R-r)
Since you have W = (2PR)/R - r the numerator R and demoninator R cancel out
leaving W = (2P) - r which doesn't make sense with what you're asking
if the problem reads like W =(2PR)/(R - r )
then
move denominator over to W
W(R - r) = 2PR and distribute W
WR - Wr = 2PR and move 2PR over
WR -Wr - 2PR = 0 and move Wr over
WR - 2PR = Wr and Facotr out R
R(W - 2P) = Wr and div by ()
R = Wr/(W - 2P)
and there you have it.
2006-09-27 08:01:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Arkane Steelblade 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The way you have this set up it does not matter what R is because it cancels out anyway (can not equal zero).
2006-09-27 14:55:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by bruinfan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
W = 2PR/R-r
W(R-r) = 2PR
2PR = W(R- r)
2PR = WR - Wr
2PR - WR = -Wr
R(2P - W) = -Wr
R = -Wr/(2P-W)
2006-09-27 15:14:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by frank 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, Frank is correct.
R = -Wr/2P-W
2006-09-27 15:55:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by cs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2x pi moses times the greatness of water splitting plus poor peoples sadness and there soles= ME!!!!!!!! moses
2006-09-27 14:51:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Adam T 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
R= W/ 2P........If thats what your question...or it could be
R= -W/2P............I think you need to re-enter the question so we can see exactly what your asking..........
2006-09-27 14:56:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by arielchrisandjunior 2
·
0⤊
0⤋