Judging by the ignorant assertions I have seen on this site, the libs would rather be governed by Saddam and Osama than GWB.
I only wish there was a way for us to make it happen for THEM (and not for the rest of us).
2006-09-27 07:17:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just the opposite , he is a villian in the american press and has been for 13 years before he was taken out by force .Before then he was helping America fight the good fight against middle east terrorism .
Many may look and say he was used and abused but all and all he sold out for power and became a murderer for hire .We hired him to do some of our dirty work and he accepted .
Lived high off the hog and no must pay the price .Justice is slow and sometimes takes years to be accomplished .
But 50 years from now people will condem George Bush for the actions he took and all americans will understand and accept just how brutle this era of politics was .
WE are just now learning of Nixons hate and bigotry of minority's and we have known for a while about Kennedy and his mistresses .We also understand people like Hoover and his commision and lies on communists with McCarthy .
It is to bad the rational educated so called liberals who point these things out are never taken seriously when changes are needed but rather long after the fact when it is to late .
As the ship sinks and there are no life boats the titanic passengers and crew new that those who cried out for more life boats where right .But i told you so is a sad last staement to make when snking into the cold dark night waters of the north atlantic .
2006-09-27 07:26:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by playtoofast 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're not the same and no there is no sympathy for Sodamn Insane (uh,,, saddam)
There's a difference between getting him out of power and going in there for the wrong reasons. How would we feel if other countries decided they didn't like Bush and attacked us to get him out of power. Sadaam needed to go but there were better ways of doing that.
Now we have committed to decades of troop involvement and trillions of dollars of expense.
Man you people have a twisted ways of thinking.
2006-09-27 07:18:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No sympathy for Saddam or Bush.
2006-09-27 07:21:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by kathy p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. when americans are unhappy with the Bush administration, they all decide to love Saddam, and support terrorists. There is no in between. Either love and support everything Bush does, or you are a terrorist who loves Saddam (which is strange, because terrorists and Saddam weren't connected before). That is what you want us to believe right?
2006-09-27 07:17:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
How could helping a generic murderer ever be "ethical" (different than, for sure, interior the eyes of politicians who stood to line their wallet good from such institutions)? I heard there grow to be a photograph circulating on youtube quite a few years in the past that confirmed a photograph from 1991 of Osama bin weighted down sitting at a picnic table at Bush's Crawford Ranch in Texas. Ten years later, he's international Enemy #one million. If that photograph grow to be genuine (i could by no skill locate it), what the hell extremely is going on?
2016-10-01 10:32:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by erlebach 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All Saddam had to do was leave Kuwait and guess what NO gulf war 1 no gulf war 2 .
2006-09-29 05:20:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I blame bush for a lot, all the time, but I have NO sympathy for Sadaam.
2006-09-27 07:17:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I certainly hope not. Saddam was a cruel dictator and even according to his own people practiced genocide, torture and did terrible things.
2006-09-27 07:17:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
just because we don't believe bush is honest and is close to a tyrant doesn't mean we support another tyrant. go find a clue and get it
2006-09-27 07:20:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by DEP 3
·
1⤊
0⤋