2006-09-27 06:01:53 · 17 answers · asked by daff73 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton by far the better president. I may not think Clinton was a good husband, lets be honest he sucked at that, but he was a good president, he worked for the people. Bush has way to many hidden agendas for my liking. He is a man that hides behind terrorism to work a hidden agenda and he is a man that feels that you can scare and bully the American people into allowing him to do whatever he wants. Maybe he is a better husband than Bill Clinton, but that in no means makes him a better man or president.
2006-09-27 06:07:53 · answer #1 · answered by Joy 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
President Bush....Clinton was busy having sex in the oval office on our time, besides the fact that he perjured himself and has since been disbarred. He also let the best chance of capturing Osama go by because he was too busy trying to save his behind from impeachment. President Bush has been busy cleaning up Clinton's messes. Yes, the economy seemed better when Clinton was in office, but it wasn't due to anything he did. It was due to his predecessor's actions. If Clinton was still in office, we would be being bombed everyday!! Our defense was terrible!! Funny how Clinton got all the praise for "the good economy" he didn't contribute to.
2006-09-27 13:18:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Clinton. He was nowhere near as arrogant as Bush. Clinton would at least listen to other points of view, unlike Bush. And Clinton was far better on the diplomatic side as well. Thats why he has my respect and Bush doesn't.
2006-09-27 13:04:20 · answer #3 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
hmm tough. i would have to say clinton. he may have done some dirty things but he was a decent president. so what if he cut the military back, at least we got out of debt. until bush spent it all on his "war against terror" what have we accomplished because of it? oh we got saddam. thats nice i mean it could have happened a long time ago but oh well. i guess people will blame clinton for that. but still we got him and not much has changed. at least for us. now the iraqies have an unstable govt on the edge of civil war. and many countries who we were frindly with view us as monsters and war mongers. but i dunno maybe its just the way i think.
2006-09-27 13:13:49 · answer #4 · answered by one glove 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton times were so much better then
2006-09-27 13:03:56 · answer #5 · answered by DeeLicious 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'll flip a coin heads Bush tails Clinton.----- It's heads Bush !!!!
2006-09-27 13:13:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
bush hes dealing with clintons mistakes and bad moral values bestowed upon usa from clintons untrust worthy behavior. presedent is supposed to be clean and honest. clinton told the world hes a liar and cheater. no one trusts usa any how, but less now.
2006-09-27 13:06:02 · answer #7 · answered by hazegrey 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would prefer Bush. Not because of his political leanings.
But because I sense that he is a true man and does not suck up to people.
If you had asked who would I want to part with,,,,then I would say Clinton.
2006-09-27 13:04:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
We can have our Clintons back. Vote Hillary.
2006-09-27 13:44:10 · answer #9 · answered by nikole s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow - now Clinton's getting the blame for the world hating us.
2006-09-27 13:08:15 · answer #10 · answered by notme 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋