What would Jesus think?
2006-09-27 04:57:27 · 21 answers · asked by martin 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Absolutely wrong. It is also a violation of The 8th amendment
2006-09-27 04:59:14 · answer #1 · answered by Bring back Democracy 3 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Wrong or right ,only Bush can answered, he knows better then
others, Bush and the gang should answer, Bush not a lone ,
He is not the one to make right and wrong ......Bush got the power,
The power came from his people , Hi's not a lone, Jesus never think about what was done by bush , Jesus take action any time he wanted to do so,
2006-09-27 12:24:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush could not care less what you, I, or Jesus thinks about torture or anything else for that matter.
Now what did Iraq have to do with 9/11 again? I forget...because the story keeps changing.
2006-09-27 12:26:55 · answer #3 · answered by mickeyg1958 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
How would I know what Jesus thinks? If I recall he was on the receiving end of some serious torture. Do you think he would think being forced to stay awake for a long time was on the same level?
2006-09-27 12:01:51 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Totally wrong. If I tortured Joe Schmoe with an electric wire, ice water and sleep deprivation, he'd tell me he was Jack the Ripper, provided I told him what I wanted to hear.
Ricky? You don't believe in the bible?
2006-09-27 12:01:17 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Don't know what Jesus would think, but I know this:
There are different kinds of torture. There are those like pulling the nails out with pliers, and cutting fingers off, and sawing the teeth off... Those are not what Bush had in mind.
And also there are those like turning the music on for days, and let the terrorist listen to the same song over and over again until he can't handle it anymore, or sit him in the vibrating chair, and he'll beg you to turn it off in about one hour, or don't let him sleep for days and days... Those are what Bush wants, and those I support as well to save lives.
So to answer your question - RIGHT.
2006-09-27 13:14:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Bush is for torture? When did this come out! I know Bush is for beating the crap out of terrorists but I don't consider that torture, I consider that better treatment than just executing them or slowly beheading them.
You would think people would be sick of playing by the rules when we are fighting a war against people who don't have rules. I would not want to stoop to their level but maybe we need to change our tactics in dealing with barbarians.
You have a family member get killed by a terrorist! You have a loved one beheaded or shot execution style. You have a loved one cut into pieces and have their body parts thrown all over the city they are working to help. Let me know if you have a problem with torture after that. Most people in this war may be innocent but so are all the innocent people being kidnapped and murdered by these people.
2006-09-27 12:20:16 · answer #7 · answered by jamie s 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋
obviously wrong, I don't think Bush actually cares about what Jesus would think. Bush does not have the slightest respect for the ten commandments
2006-09-27 12:03:55 · answer #8 · answered by me 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
President Bush is not "for torture", he has simply asked for a definition of the vaguely written third amendment of the Geneva Conventions. Jesus also liked people to tell it like it is.
2006-09-27 12:02:34 · answer #9 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋
bush put us in torture.
2006-09-27 12:06:26 · answer #10 · answered by BetterStartLiving 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋