conservatives say clinton was weak on defense becasue he didnt capture bin laden, has mr. bush, that makes conservatives hypocrites, lol.
2006-09-27 04:44:27 · 8 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's not about Bin Laden at all. Bin Laden is merely a patsy used by the U.S. government in order to cover up the truth of what's REALLY going on!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2006-09-27 05:55:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excellent point! It's been 5 YEARS since the 9/11 attacks took place, and Osama bin Laden STILL hasn't been caught! If Bush & Co. had really cared about making our country safer and getting justice for the 3,000 who died, they would have focused on capturing bin Laden. Instead, they saw the attacks as a golden opportunity to make up an excuse to go to Iraq and get to the oil.
2006-09-27 04:50:34 · answer #2 · answered by tangerine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conservatives do not say that. That is a cold, hard lie. They say _low Job Bill is weak on defense because he reduced defense spending and reduced our armed forces to a second class military. They ALSO say that he did not capture OBL when he had the opportunity. More BS against the wall to see how it smells by you commislamic radicals?
2006-09-27 05:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is all they understand a thank you to do. They easily can not clarify why we've been given hit with 9/11 at the same time as Bush grow to be examining approximately puppy goats to infants. they are able to't clarify why the Taliban is increasing lower back in Afghanistan via fact they desperate to make some greater money for Halliburton in Iraq. A prominant women individuals's rights activist, who grow to be doing the CRIME of having colleges for women folk, grow to be murdered very presently accessible by potential of the Taliban. that isn't the 1st one, the two. plenty for Bush's "they'll greet us as liberators" bullpucky. hint: 9/11 occurred on Bush's watch whilst he had intel that some thing grow to be going to take place. You wanna blame somebody? Blame the fool who can not even say nuclear wisely and would quite study "My puppy Goat" than the intelligence comments. He brags approximately not examining and that he has human beings do his examining for him. at the same time as I easily have a topic with Clinton taking great element approximately his place of means with women individuals and together with his enaction of NAFTA, he grow to be a miles better president than Bush. He easily can ACT like he has an oz.. of compassion and love. All I see from Bush is a wealthy, spoiled, conceited, hateful, holier-than-thou hypocrite. utilizing means to seduce women individuals isn't something whilst in comparison with the loads of hundreds of girls individuals and infants Bush has had a hand in slaughtering. wager that shouldn't come as a marvel. He used to adhere firecrackers up the behinds of frogs as a new child. you recognize what form of individuals animal abusers improve as much as be. Psychopaths. seem human beings, Bush's daddy and Reagan armed the two Saddam and Osama Bin encumbered. Their form of distant places coverage, REPUBLICAN distant places coverage is what led to 9/11. you will not pay attention it on the information yet you could not instruct what I purely mentioned incorrect. Our u . s . armed the two Saddam and BIN encumbered. you recognize, the guy that orchestrated 9/11. awaken human beings. it's time to vote in November. permit's get those bumbleflocks outta there.
2016-12-18 17:57:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hes not a failure ... hes increased the empire quite a bit ... granted, at the expense of a few thousand american lives and the infringment of american rights and liberties ... hes many things.. azzhole, dictator, nazi, facist, evil, antichrist ... the "failure" to capture binladen is a success in disguise ... he fooled the whole dam world into believing this guy is a threat to the most powerful nation on planet earth while we invaded 1/2 of the middle east ...
2006-09-27 04:51:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do you call him Boy George? Boy George was a successful singer. GWB has not been successful at anything, ever.
2006-09-27 04:56:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually that makes them arrogant for thinking that they could capture him. And that makes them dead wrong and that makes them look foolish.
2006-09-27 04:49:23 · answer #7 · answered by This Is Not Honor 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, that was obvious a long time ago.
2006-09-27 04:46:31 · answer #8 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋