does bush need to get out of office now?
2006-09-27 03:40:26 · 8 answers · asked by UNSEENHAND 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The biggest enemy America has is its President, going into Iraq to get rid of weapons of mass destruction that did not exist was at least a big 'boo boo' but, as every American knows and the rest of the world (especialy Britain). George is not the brightest of politcian's. In fact I would go on to say, he is probably the dumbest President you have ever had. Only Tony Blair (his puppet) and Britains Prime minister is dumber and it looks like Tony is already on his way out. The problem with stealing someone's oil is the consequences, and they have been high for both America and Britain. The freedom Fighters of Iraq have given us a bloody nose and we appear to want to go back for more. America and to a much smaller extent Britain have commited unforgivable atrocities which have esculated the trouble and given the freedom fighters the support of the people. On top of that George's actions have not controlled terrorism as the engagement was supposed to do but, mearly lead to a greater threat and greater recruitment to the various opposing factions with arabs coming to support Iraq from all over the middle east(even Iraq's sworn enemy, the 'Taliban'). God! have George and our Tony created a mess. Meanwhile the Iraq people are dying in their droves. Inocent men woman and children Of course America did everything it could to prevent civilian casualties like: rounding em up beating them up; torturing them; to make sure they got the children droped a few cluster bombs for good measure and if that failed went into homes of the iraq's and simply mowed em down. To top every thing, America has provided concentration camps to keep the prisoners without hope trial and human rights, commiting torture at will and not allowing any interference or monotoring from neutral sources and it goes on. Yes you Americans and we British have a lot to be proud of. After reading this why don't you stand up and sing the national anthern it should give you a sense of liberty and asolve you from any guilt and make the killing of women children and other inocent victims the right thing to do. Does George need to go? well, I think you already know the answer to that.
Surely over two hundred thousand Iraq lives are enough revenge for three thousand American lives especialy when it has always been known that Saddham had nothing to do with September the 11th and that Sadham was actualy fighting off the 'Taliban' Himself.
2006-09-27 04:54:10 · answer #1 · answered by Redmonk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You look at Bush as a villain, but what choice did he have after 9-11...do nothing or what he has done? It is not Bush, it is the whole system. The problems of the Middle-East began a long time ago when the US pampered the Shah of Iran at the expense of the people. America has a fantastic ability to send the worst people to work on the worst problems. The war will be a carbon copy of Vietnam...waste of lives....waste of money...and nothing resolved.
2006-09-27 03:46:39 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I think this war on Terrorism was a long time in comming. It is a difficult one that is true but it had to come. eventually we will win it but we can't give in to them, and allow them to continue. taking thousands of lives at a time when does it end?
Just be thankful the enemy is doing it over there and not here. The next question is though after they have been trained in the fields of Iraq, and they have lost....Where will the next generation go and how will they fight their Jihad?
No Bush does not need to go. He has been a good Leader!
2006-09-27 03:56:33 · answer #3 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at the initiating, you're so biased in the route of the right that it really isn't any longer even f--king humorous. of route it really is by no skill surpassed off to you that perchance Al Zarqawi had done his homework (like I have, and a lot of others like me) and somewhat knew what's occurring (i.e. Bush admin lied about 9/11; about Iraq)? which isn't what you spot on your loved one, Halliburton subsidized FOX information. the element is, it would not count number: because of each of the mass media propaganda hostile to him, who would have taken Zarqawi heavily? I doubt even the most left leaning American conflict protester because regrettably those human beings nevertheless trust contained in the mass media, for some stupid reason... yet what do i understand, perfect? i'm only yet another one in each of those left leaning Bush bashing liberals you do not have any time for! Why is that? because the reality hurts? turn off FOX information and open your eyes: the international you stay in is all in phantasm masquerading as reality. trust me. i understand this stuff.
2016-11-24 22:16:50 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the war would go better if all you pinheads were not on line giving moral support to our enemies. What I find funny about the whole thing is that is the Muslims win, you and your kind will be the first ones to get your stupid heads chopped off. In a way maybe we should lose. I look forward to my conversion and the chance to freely hunt and behead those that caused us to lose out freedom.
2006-09-27 03:44:16 · answer #5 · answered by utahraptor88 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, I believe our media needs to be horsewhipped. They always make things worse than they are. Loose lips sink ships was the motto back in WWII.
2006-09-27 03:43:23 · answer #6 · answered by Mommymonster 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh now, don't paint things as worse than they are. A little healthy scepticism gone too far.
2006-09-27 03:50:40 · answer #7 · answered by Robert A 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it has definately gotten out of hand on Y!Answers.
2006-09-27 03:45:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋