English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

The number of planets was eight before 1930 when Pluto was discovered. What did astrologists do then?

Wjay did they do before 1846 when Neptune was discovered? What did they do before 1781 when Uranus was discovered?

What did they do before 1543 and the Earth being made into a planet and the Sun and Moon dropped from being planets once the Copernican heliocentric Solar System was proposed as preferable to the geocentric system of Ptolemy?

They lagged some way behind science and then thought of a way of how they would catch up, I suggest..

2006-09-27 03:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by Argonautical 1 · 5 0

nothing has happened to pluto.

http://www.iau.org/fileadmin/content/pdfs/Resolution_GA26-5-6.pdf

pluto is not a planet. pluto and charon are considered a binary system, but two small bodies orbit this system. they are called nix and hydra. this does not change anything about the solar system or pluto. it just corrects the mistake of classifying pluto as a planet initially.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

pluto orbits the sun, is round, does not have an isolated orbit (a bunch of other similar bodies have similar orbits.), and is not a satellite so it is a dwarf planet.

this same thing has happened before. beginning in 1800, astronomers found a few bodies orbiting between the orbits of mars and jupiter, and they finally stopped calling them planets after the fourth discovery. astronomers then added numerals to the names, and pluto recently got its numeral. 150 years from now, no one will think of "134340 pluto" as a planet. very few will even know we classified it as a planet. "1 ceres" and "136199 eris" are other dwarf planets.

i have been waiting for this since i was about twelve. i feel somewhat satisfied. i knew that pluto didn't fit the pattern set by the major bodies in the solar system so it was an anomaly. it just felt illogical and "out of place". this was the right thing to do, believe me. i don't understand why so many are having such a problem with this.

i don't know how long this will drag on tho. many planetary scientists are not satisfied that the definition is rigorous enough.

incidentally, look here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomy

2006-09-27 07:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by warm soapy water 5 · 0 0

Because just recently the astrological people came up with a conclusion and with I guess some proof that Pluto is not actually a planet at all but a dwarf or moon.. I found it crazy when I heard this because I went through school and so did my sons thinking that Pluto was really a planet! I and some people thought that to be an amazing discovery.

2006-09-27 04:24:50 · answer #3 · answered by beagirl40 4 · 0 1

In Astrology were not consider only 9 planets....there were considered asteroids as well, like Cheron, Pallas, Ceres, and many other factors that "serious " astrologers use for study of the "cycles".
Pluto's denomination from "Planet" to "dwarf" or "planetoid" won't change anything in an "astrological" study. Pluto is still "there".

2006-09-27 04:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by UncleGeorge 4 · 0 1

planet pluto, as you know is another small planet, small enough to be a moon. lately, 3 more space objects have been discovered ( one is pluto's moon, and 2 planets in the asteroid belt between mars and jupiter) that qualify as planets. to keep the planet ideology intact, that is, to make those space objects, which sensually can't be considered planets, stay what they were (asteroid, moon, or dwarf), they rose the needs for a space object to be named a "planet". because of that, pluto didn't qualify, and got relegated to a dwarf.

making the solar system theory we have now.

2006-09-27 03:25:15 · answer #5 · answered by Moe A 2 · 0 0

Recently, scientist met to finally decide on the definition of the word "Planet". According to the definition they came with, among other definitions they decided on, Pluto is now classified as a "Dwarf" or "Minor" planet due to it's orbit and shape.

2006-09-27 03:26:28 · answer #6 · answered by krkretz 3 · 0 0

The 2006 definition of "planet" by skill of the worldwide Astronomical Union (IAU) states that interior the photograph voltaic gadget a planet is a celestial physique that: * is in orbit around the solar, * has adequate mass so as that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (almost around) shape, and * has "cleared the community" around its orbit. A non-satellite tv for pc physique satisfying in easy terms the 1st 2 of those standards is classed as a "dwarf planet", on an identical time as a non-satellite tv for pc physique satisfying in easy terms the 1st criterion is named a "small photograph voltaic gadget physique" (SSSB). The definition replace right into a debatable one, and has drawn the two help and grievance from distinctive astronomers. in accordance to the definition, there are at present 8 planets and 3 dwarf planets conventional interior the photograph voltaic gadget. The definition distinguishes planets from smaller bodies, and isn't any longer used exterior the photograph voltaic gadget, the place smaller bodies can't be discovered yet. Exoplanets are coated separately under a complementary 2003 draft training for the definition of planets, which distinguishes them from dwarf stars, that are larger.

2016-12-12 16:04:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

now it is nepton moon

2006-09-27 07:49:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers