2006-09-27 02:00:38 · 11 answers · asked by Super Shirazz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
or is it because of race?
2006-09-27 02:02:09 · update #1
That's correct. lol
2006-09-27 02:02:02 · answer #1 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton had a history of harassing women. No less than 3 women came forward about his fooling around behind Hillary's back. Clarence Thomas was only one, but that doesn't make it better. Clinton lied to the public on TV when he denyed having a relationship with Monica. I would not be surprised that Clinton has STD's or something with all the women he has slept with.
Edna
2006-09-27 02:04:40 · answer #2 · answered by edna_romano_1943 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was not right for either but you must see the political positions that each had. Clinton was the president and Thomas was a lowly judge. Nothing about race there. Hypothetically speaking, what do you think would happen if President Bush would do what Clinton done? What do you think would happen? Do you honestly think people would say that is his private life or would they want a lynching?
2006-09-27 02:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is never ok to harass someone else. However, remember that in both the case of Clinton and Thomas, they each denied harassment.
2006-09-27 02:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the difference between Clinton and Thomas is that the girls gave themselves willing to Bill, Clarence was rejected.
2006-09-27 02:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by desert_kats 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's no longer ok for all of us. Clinton settled a case with Paula Jones on sexual harassment the place he replace into fined $850,000 in 1998. Then in 1999 decide Wright discovered Clinton in civil contempt of courtroom for deceptive testimony and fined ordered him to pay Jones $ninety one,000. decide Wright referred the case to the bar the place Clinton agreed to loose his regulation license for 5 years. remember the 'bimbo eruption team' he had for the duration of the two campaigns. Then there replace into Juanita Broderick, and the others. Clarence Thomas replace into in easy terms charged with it in a politically charged confirmation listening to.The committee could desire to no longer discover adequate data to verify Anita Hill's declare. Anita Hill in no way filed a criticism in courtroom. i think of that's a defective assessment.
2016-12-12 16:02:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am reminded of the time I noticed a man trying to pick pockets on a bus. I made an announcement to the other riders to watch their belongings because there is a pickpocket on the bus. This man declared that I said what I did because he was black. I replied that it didn't matter what color his fingers were, it mattered that they were trying to steal an old lady's money.
He and a very exasperated accomplice got off the bus at the next stop. Good riddance.
2006-09-27 02:11:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton got impeached. Thomas got on the supreme court. Who is getting preferential treatment?
2006-09-27 02:05:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Clinton has the support of NOW. The two-faced, hypocritical phony, Gloria Steinem brushed Clinton's sexual harassment off as "boys will be boys"--another reason to detest both of them.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0825887/bio
2006-09-27 02:16:16 · answer #9 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get over it, stop harassing DEMOCRATS and Clinton. Clinton was one of the SMARTEST president we have had in a long time. GET A LIFE for goodness sake.
2006-09-27 02:03:54 · answer #10 · answered by bubbles26 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
how many millions was spent on the whole clinton thing?
2006-09-27 02:04:10 · answer #11 · answered by lethallolita 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋