I know they hit us on 9/11 but I was think to myself, just the act of declaring war gives them more of a reason to do more terror. I understand that they dont need much of a reason to hit us anyway but I dont think is was wise to actualy say we declare war on Terrorist. What do you think.
2006-09-27 01:58:10 · 9 answers · asked by DEEJay 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I liked all of your answers even the guy who insulted me. I want to fight the terrorist I just dont think you can declare a war on something if you cant win
2006-09-27 02:08:49 · update #1
Dude,
The odds are mighty that you will never meet a terrorist or be caught in an act of terrorism. And you will never meet anyone who has either.
In fact the only contact you will have with terrorism will be seeing the anouncers on Fox News tell you what the daily terror alert is.
The millitary industrial complex and media are making a lot of money out of everyones fear.
Once the young fundamentalist moslems of today grow old and disillusioned, like the communists of yesterday, they will fade away.
Then the public will be presented with another terrible enemy, and everyone will be frightened by the news stories and our taxes will be spent on more useless pieces of millitary hardware that never get used.
Take a deep breath and relax.
2006-09-27 02:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by Pastor Sauce 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, not really. You see, Osama Bin Laden, the leader of Al Queda and the figurehead for other jihadists groups declared war on the US back in 1998. That's would be three years prior to 9/11. They meant it. It matters not what we declared or didn't declare, they are at war with us regardless.
2006-09-27 09:03:40 · answer #2 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WOW...crazy answers! I believe UBL DECLARED war back in 1996...it just took the Clinton administration a few years to figure it out...in other words WE DIDN'T initially declare war.
And I would rather we fight them THERE instead of HERE....Pastor Sauce stating you will probably never meet a terrorist...WHY do you think that is?...our government, no matter your political leaning, is doing a darn good job of keeping them at bay...doing things that you will never see or know on a day to day basis...which is why leakers and the media should be prosecuted for divulging our secret methods!
2006-09-27 09:13:49 · answer #3 · answered by just me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If some one hits you and you defend your self does the person that hit you first then have the right to beat you down?
That is what youare really asking.The answer under law is no.
2006-09-27 09:05:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In war all is fair as long as you abide by the Geneva Convention. Oops, didn't bush just redefine portions of it.
2006-09-27 09:01:16 · answer #5 · answered by desert_kats 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perceptionally, i think no. It is like Germans and Japan during WW2. they started the war, they end it with global compensations.
2006-09-27 09:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, so let Japan hit us, we'll say we're not really at war with Japan so they won't hurt us again so much.
wtf is wrong with your thinking
2006-09-27 09:03:12 · answer #7 · answered by pinkgoatwithmentalissues 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure.. bring 'em on. We're ready.
Who started it in the first place?
If someone hits you, you gotta hit back. That's the American way.
2006-09-27 09:02:53 · answer #8 · answered by Nightrider 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All is fair in love and war.
2006-09-27 09:03:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋