that's one reason. Liberals claim to be for minorities, which is racist, furthermore libs aren't for minorities in the Republican party.
Democrats fought tooth and nail to prevent Bush from appointing our present Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales. He's more than qualified to hold the position, so why would they do that? Because of his ethnicity, that's why.
2006-09-27 02:24:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by askthetoughquestions 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not particularly. It's not required to like every black person to be categorized as not racist. On the other hand, when they call Republicans and/or Bush a racist when he appoints people like Colin Powell & Condi Rice to high positions, it tells me that they think only liberals are really black.
2006-09-27 02:11:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a difference between between intelligent and being right for the job. Condi is in over her head, as is her boss. If your narrow little mind equates not liking the job an African American is doing with racism, then that's your problem.
2006-09-27 02:09:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you bigoted or racist because you don't like anybody? I don't like Condi Rice because as with most repuke's she cannot think for herself. She is a Bush yes man, and since I don't like a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals running the country I don't like her for liking him. Now do you want to know how I feel about you.
2006-09-27 01:59:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Who is Condi Rice?
2006-09-27 02:06:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What color is INTEGRITY?
I still stand by my opinion that Condi Rice emanates an air of putrifaction. I still maintain that she is reminiscent of the portrait of Dorian Grey without the painting.
This has nothing to do with race, it has to do with who she is internally-and that is very ugly. I, of course, expect another violation for this, but Y!A is not real life, so it really doesn't matter
2006-09-27 02:04:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
it is your opinion, in spite of the indisputable fact that the info instruct that hillary is in a similar way lacking in any skills to be commander in chief. as mitt romney suggested, she needs to cope with the biggest company contained in the international (the U. S. authorities), yet hasn't ever run something, no longer a city, no longer a state, no longer even a nook shop. she is way extra polarizing than obama, who has continually beaten hillary between independents. hillary appeals only to the democrat base, and also you could not win an election with that. sure, rev. wright's comments are nerve-racking, yet obama has disavowed them, and if anybody can make sure out the thanks to get interior his mind or coronary heart to examine no matter if he consents with the statements, then i imagine maximum human beings are prepared to grant him the great aspect about the doubt. what i hit upon extra nerve-racking is that hillary felt the favor to lie (a minimum of three circumstances) about her vacation to bosnia to toughen her overseas coverage "experience", understanding that many witnesses ought to refute her expenditures, inclusive of the "snipers" who met her bearing flowers and poems.
2016-11-24 22:07:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by manger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No that makes us smart.Some of the people on the right wing side who defend her dont even know she has an oil tanker named after her, think it is more liberal lies. She just well shes ugly,not pleasing to look at.Very ugly in fact and she just lies all the time for her massah, so no I dont like her.
2006-09-27 02:02:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Condi rice has a very conservative agenda.
That's why I don't like her.
2006-09-27 01:56:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Villain 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, I don't think they are. Politics aside, she seems like an intelligent thinking woman. She just says really really stupid things, and contradicts herself on a continual basis.
2006-09-27 01:57:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by CE S 3
·
1⤊
1⤋