constant admonishing ideal PURITY of the “free”-market kind of capitalism actually
an homage to ANARCHY and really quite the OPPOSITE of a genuine fiscal-conservativism?
I mean isn’t financial/conservatism really supposed to be about exercising sensible studious restraint in all things concerning money, resources,etc ?
I mean like why is it that /American/ conservatism in particular, wants to control everyone’s life in the social dimension these past few decades, and when it comes to money, influence on businesses, etc – dimension everything is three sheets to the wind… let havoc must roam about freely. Screw the planet, but when it comes to economy the beast must set itself right magically. The “natural” balance must be preserved.
Why don’t I see anything “natural order” looking into this kind of extreme market purity philosophy at all. It’s damn lazy if you ask me.
Am I somehow just not looking hard enough?
2006-09-27 01:14:45 · 2 answers · asked by roostershine 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Capitalism / God ?
Well at least that much makes sense. People love to hurredly scamper half-frenzied into obscure endless circles whenever you invite them to "speak economics".
:-)
2006-09-27 01:58:19 · update #1
ACTUALLY, I'm still reading. I think I can see the point's made. It's hard for me to follow much "economy" detail all at once. I have to try to read that kind of stuff slowly.
2006-09-27 02:04:10 · update #2
also, perhaps I really mean
"free"-ENTERPRISE and not exactly "free market". I don't know.
2006-09-27 02:09:53 · update #3
You do not understand political conservatism.
Conservatives believe in protecting American markets, to maintain a strong economy and defense. Allow the "free" market to locate steel-making jobs in China? Uh, where are we going to get steel to build tanks when we need it, especially if a war breaks out in Asia? High technology manufacturing and support in India? Leave Americans to do retail and service industry jobs that are traditionally low-paying? No, that this not the conservatism that built a Republican Party.
Some "conservatives" have a faith in the free market form of capitalism that exceeds their faith in God.
2006-09-27 01:27:21 · answer #1 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the present mess comes immediately from Liberals forcing banks to make loans to unqualified customers. a lot for the loose marketplace. Republicans ought to now authorize a seven hundred Billion $ Socialistic purchase of undesirable loans, OR Watch a large monetary failure between the 'victimized' lenders and the organizations who've been procuring & promoting those undesirable loans. So the GOP is cut up in this one. Now the Dems can override the GOP yet it really isn't any longer the sport PLAN!!! (grimy little secret alert) The timing of this 'disaster' isn't any twist of destiny. a foul monetary gadget receives Obama elected, somewhat if it could be blamed on Bush & the Republicans. Why did ninety 5 Dems vote WITH the Reps to kill the buyout? extremely some sturdy Dems suggested 'no' because they percentage the GOP distain for Socialism. in spite of the indisputable fact that the Pelosi's gang 'no voters' did it so she ought to stroll out of the vote and say: "We tried to fix this yet those rattling Republicans stopped us." the prospect of a restore earlier Election Day is nil. it truly is professional-wrestling. it truly is politics. Liberals do no longer weep for suffering organizations. elect Obama, THEN restore the monetary gadget. That’s the plan. imagine it really is Bush's fault? Watch the vid:
2016-11-24 22:03:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋