Pleasegive me a reason to?

Question

dislike Mr bush more than i alrady do. this is not a realm for infighting i am niether repub nor am i lib ... i jst think we have a dult for a pres in the usa right now ... please and fuelto my fire .

Wonderfull! Thank you for proving my point. I was wondering how many people would focus purely on my grammer and use it to insult me "ie:.Colorado,dieselpup...tok h"

I also wanted to see how many people would stop me in my tracks because I used the term hate. "mindrizzl..."

It seems only a few people on this thread care about conversation where most of you seem to be trolling for places to pick fights and make fun.

However, i did not think some one would come here to place blame ona former presedint for his own failures!

moral808, you are a sad excuse for a citzen. Why do you hate america? Condi rice even said in grand testmony that clinton left a clear set of "actionable items, and ideas on how to follow through" And now say nothing was there. Clinton went in to the middle east as far as he could go to get Osama, and did it up to the letter of the law. when cia and fbi could not prove Osma took part in attacks against us and our interestn --- below. ---

The same people who are in bushes Bush's cabinet now are the very same men who stood on the floor of the senate and told the world Clinton was wagging the dog, to draw away from his impeachment trials and scandal. Keep in mind these men are the one who styarted those same trials. So clinton is trying to cath Osma while Repuiblicans are trying to distract him from job over a BJ.

But bush only lied to invade iraq and kill inocent civailns in the name of demoracy while Osma " who he has not cuaght yet even though he said he would" Runs free.


Maybe my spelling is not allways on point.

But i know a murder when i see one.
and i know a pupettet of a murder whne he type on this thread. GOOD DAY SIR!

Answer 1

I don't like him either, but I will not give any reason why hate should be spread more than it already is. Hate is already to prevelant (sp?).

"You know, we could all be reading a book right now." -- Huey Freeman

Answer 2

Pres. Bush is faced with the biggest problems this nation has ever faced and he is trying to resolve it with political criticism...no easy job. He is honest, sincere and really cares about the country. He is working to keep us all safe while his opponents buck him but have no plans or idea how to resolve the problems he is faced with.

Answer 3

You might just want to poke around here http://www.global-conspiracies.com/ I'm sure that'll add fuel to your fire. The entry under "Concentration Camps" is especially explosive....

Answer 4

No child left behind.

Answer 5

Because when it comes to education, you were obviously a "child left behind."

Answer 6

I think we have a dult for a question here...

...whatever a dult is...???

Answer 7

Okay, he likes good spellers.

Answer 8

spelling

Answer 9

This struggle isn't about Iraq or Afghanistan or Iran and Syria. This is about changing hearts and minds. I have my criticisms of the Bush administration but I believe he is doing the best job he knows how to do, and I believe this country was caught with its breeches down on 9/11. We didn't know how to react, because we simply didn't have the information we needed at the time to make informed decisions. This is the fog of war. We know this, we suspect that, and none of it is sure. I have to lay a large part of that at the feet of Bill Clinton because he cut the budget of the military and intelligence organizations to balance the federal budget while spending like drunken sailors on everything else. He said last Sunday that "he was aware of the threat of Bin Laden and that he tried and failed to kill Bin Laden but at least he tried." But the tragedy of 9/11 was exacerbated by the fact that we had nobody in intelligence with boots on the ground in the Middle East to listen to the political climate, to collect the kind of information that can't be retrieved with satellites and spy planes.

The real issue here is, what will make Muslims less of a threat to world peace and security? And the answer as far as I can see is to convince the mouthpieces and those that trust them, that prosecuting aggression against the west will not net them the results they seek. They have plainly spoken their agenda and it isn't to be taken lightly. They want to rule the world and they have multiple plans in operation to achieve just that.

One way is to immigrate to western states as in France and by sheer numbers take over the government. Another is by force as in Spain. Another is Bin Laden's way. He believed we would not respond in a long drawn out campaign because we have lost our American spirit. Bush told us atop the pile of rubble that it would require a long drawn out campaign to accomplish the necessary task to turn the tide of terror. It only took months for half the country to forget those words and the spirit in which they were received. Was Bin Laden right? Have we lost our spirit? http://judgeright.blogspot.com under the article titled "In Their Own Words" you'll find many links to video of their most popular political and religious leaders saying exactly that under the bold words.

Why do the media prosecute a war against the American reputation in the world, even our own media? They compare the actions of a few Americans to those of all terrorists and demand that we treat them according to edicts of the Geneva Convention when they are not held to the same standards. The reveal our secret operations and methods of interrogations which by the way do not even enter the same solar system as the jihadi's treatment of captured citizens let alone military. They compare our operations against aggressors with their targeting of innocent civilians.

Personally, I wish they would treat this as more of a conventional war. Again on my blog, you'll find that the TV networks are spewing murder and hatred 24/7 through music videos and movies and just about every religious program against the West. In Iran, Syria, Palestine, etc., over Palestinian Authority TV and al Jezeera. We have to blast our own TV signal into these regions to get the message of the West into the people because they are getting nothing else from their own networks. It is popular to hate the west, it is taught in the school curriculum in Iran, it is overwhelmingly accepted that the West is the Great Satan.

I am not looking for a new crusade, but logic tells me that a great defeat, and blame for mass destruction on the heads of these same leaders, called down on them by their own words, is the only way to change this torrent of mass lies and hysteria.

P*ssy footing around and blaming America for the damage done to innocents, as the media and half our politicians are doing is strengthening the enemy's resolve and encouraging their recruitment rates. Whereas, flattening the capitols of 1 or 2 countries could save the long drawn out struggle. Look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two explosions brought a long drawn out struggle to an abrupt end. Many lives were saved on balance. Had the struggle continued as it had for two more years, as much as a million troops from both sides would have been lost not to mention the innocents that were dieing from the carpet bombing campaigns. Just because we have the technology to surgically strike does not make surgical strikes the best option. Our reputation is suffering in the world anyway, what motivation do we have to continue a struggle with surgical strikes when a double standard is applied to our forces compared to our enemy's? What benefit to innocent lives if the struggle continues for another 5 or 20 years?

Why does the U.N. condemn U.S. tactics while the terrorists march merrily on with heinous acts against civilians? I don't like being seen as the big bully on the block either, but thanks to the U.N., the media, and half our politicians, that is our image. Sometimes people need to see a bully tactic to gain perspective on reality. Reality is, up till now, we have been the only morally influenced party in this conflict. If we know the location of al Jezeera and the Palestinian Authority's TV broadcasting operation, they should be powder by now. If we hear another dictator dictate morality to us, he should be in the very same condition. If we know Bin Laden or any other terrorist leader is within a 50 mile radius, we should dump a radio active firestorm on his cave, mountain, or city. See how long the attitude of blame America carries on, then. I guarantee that every country's leader will dump the bodies of these gnats called terrorists on our doorstep pleading with us to take our big stick and go home, because they will make sure we have nothing to worry about anymore. If a bully we are called, then a bully we should be, at least for a little while.

Answer 10

You have to be kind to animals.