if only i had a dollar for everytime i saw this question!
2006-09-27 00:04:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Claude 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Animals bear a core called SOUL while humans bear a core called SPIRIT..This distinction has to do with the point of origin of the two species;the spirit comes from the spiritual realm while the animal comes from the animistic realm which is lower than the spiritual realm.In the begining there were only animals on earth. And the only way humans were to appear on earth was for their spirits to incarnate through the most developed animal body which was that of a species of apes (not monkeys). That was the very first incarnation of HUMAN SPIRITS on earth.And as these animal bodies bearing spirit cores matured they could only bear spiritual offsprings. This was the begining of the multiplication of humans on earth.However, those apes that could develope so far as to attract spirit germs as offsprings are now extinct.So Darwins theory is true in connection with the gross material bodies only but not with the innermost consistency of the species. Therefore Animal bodies were used as the gateway for the first incarnation of human spirits to the earth.And these bodies have devloped over the centuries to what it is today.
2006-09-27 00:43:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by DarkAngel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are 4 elements in the theory of evolution:
1) Evolution
2) Gradual
3) Selective
4) 1 origin
We all evolve from 1 origin and it happens gradually to only a few selected species of organisms. Monkeys, more likely apes, have different kinds of species. the species in which we evolved from is the Ramapithecus.
2006-09-27 00:18:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by grimreaperinpink 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
buddy, going by the darwin's theory some of the species of monkey or apes became advanced than others and evolved into today's homo sapiens. And there is no doubt the evolution hasn't stopped yet. Each and every living species is evolving day-by-day into a better sample than its previous counterpart. The process of evolution still continues. It goes on. That's why apes still exist.
2006-09-27 00:11:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by maverick 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow, another one.
This question must be in the fundamentalist manual under "Publicly Displaying Your Ignorance."
Darwin (with a dubya, like yer fayveret prezzy-dolt) did not say man evolved from monkey. In fact, monkeys evolved from a common ancestor to man. We are both end products for our environment.
Further, just because a new species evolves doesn't mean the old one disappears. That is why there are different kinds of fish - sharks AND barricudas - even when they share similar ecological niches.
So "scietific" old buddy, stuff that in your psalter and see if it purifies your sanctum.
2006-09-27 00:04:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Grendle 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Darwin suspected Humans evolved from Neanderthals
Neanderthals had a great uncle twice removed on his father's side that was a more monkey like creature, but Neanderthals escaped that fate but accidentally losing body hair and developing technology and moving closer to sapience.
2006-09-27 00:09:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by jsbrads 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
for the previous answer..(its no need to speak perfect english to be in a converstation..if y are smart learn another language,y speak only 1 like monkeys)
ok monkeys become human no in 1 day but in thousand of years, under some specific conditions,in some places of the earth the conditions was no proper for this evolution so they monkeys still exist..
2006-09-27 00:10:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by free3yourmind 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then if we share a hardship-unfastened ancestor then we are did our ancestors greater from ? Hmmmmm? How dose that make any sense? And why so good judgment and not lifelike i'm effective are ancestors greater from monkey like mamals did no longer you ever watch the evolution of guy from natgeo. we've been basically monkeys rominng the floor then grew to alter into bipedal ate meat grew to alter into sensible used procedures so your telling me that under the marvelous situations i will't reason yet another species to conform with replace into bipedal improve greater sensible or perhaps genetically alter thier race with human DNA to alter into like us. that's rediculus and close minded i've got self belief we are human to do exactly that. yet having suggested that the human race is selfish and in easy terms idol a stupid God or w/e yet previously guy got here up with this stupid mentality that nature is agains us yet like human beings continuously.what we predict of is against us is quite what have been against human beings are the authentic God's!!!!!! If God gave us intelligence why no longer animals possibly the international could be greater desirable off
2016-12-12 16:00:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to Darwin's Theory of Evolution, man evolved from primates. If that is the case, why do monkeys still exist even after the evolution?
That is how you phrase a question. You make a real sentence. You get the names RIGHT plus you capitalize them and you spell correctly.
Instead of worrying about things like this.....work on your English. Geez.
2006-09-27 00:05:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Trollhair 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
That is not correct. Darwin said man and monkeys evolved from a common distant ancestor.
2006-09-27 13:53:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by flugelberry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution branches. It is not a straight line. Just because a new species arises doesn't require the parent species to die out.
And men and apes, not monkeys, share a common primate ancestor.
2006-09-27 00:16:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by marsel_duchamp 7
·
1⤊
0⤋